Laserfiche WebLink
During discussion at the June meeting, Board members indicated that vacation rentals can be properly <br />run and that by explicitly making them legal, many could "come out of the shadows" and be properly <br />licensed by the state. At the July 10, 2012 hearing, the Board adopted an ordinance that specifically <br />allows residential units to be rented -out for any period of time (daily, weekly, or longer). At that <br />hearing, the Board directed staff to develop a mechanism to handle complaints and ensure that known <br />vacation rentals get properly licensed by the state. Excerpts of minutes from both Board hearings are <br />attached (see attachment #3) <br />• 2012 — Present: Since the July 2012 code change, code enforcement staff has handled and <br />maintained a log of general inquiries and complaints related to vacation rentals. Site specific <br />complaints are investigated and turned over to the state Department of Professional Business <br />Regulation (DPBR) for its determination on whether or not a state vacation rental dwelling license is <br />required. (State investigations can take several months, especially if rental activity is minimal. While <br />a state investigation is active, the state will not provide code enforcement staff any information about <br />the investigation. Violations of local regulations, if any, are handled through normal code <br />enforcement procedures. Upon a determination by the state that a license is required, and upon <br />issuance of a state license, staff notifies the license holder about County residential parking <br />requirements, and informs the clerk's office (see attachment #4). <br />1 <br />Since July 2012, staff has received 5 general inquiries and 10 site-specific complaints regarding <br />vacation rentals which included complaints about parking and impaired traffic flow. Of those 10 <br />complaints, 5 were determined not to be used as a vacation rental, 2 were issued state licenses, and 3 <br />have open investigations by the state. A copy of the current log is attached (see attachment #6). <br />Based on that data, it appears that the number of site specific complaints in the unincorporated county <br />has been relatively low, so far. Nonetheless, since July 2012, the percentage of unincorporated county <br />site-specific vacation rental parking/traffic complaints compared to the total estimated number of <br />vacation rentals in the unincorporated county (+ 4%) exceeded the percentage of unincorporated <br />county parking/traffic complaints related to conventional residences (± 2.4%) during the same three <br />year period. <br />In addition, recent research conducted by the County Attorney's Office indicates that there may be <br />more than 375 vacation rental units county -wide that are offered for rent on the internet. It appears <br />that roughly 250 vacation rental units are offered for rent in the unincorporated county. Planning staff <br />research indicates that numerous local governments in Florida and other high tourist areas have <br />experienced parking problems related to vacation rentals due to the frequency of larger than normal <br />parking demands for such units. Such parking problems are reflected in recent position papers issued <br />by the Florida League of Cities. Furthermore, the rise of internet and hand-held device tools and <br />applicatios, together with the rise of management agencies, will make the marketing and <br />management of vacation rentals easier. Consequently, the potential for increased vacation rental <br />activity and related parking/traffic nuisances in the unincorporated county may be significant without <br />proper parking regulations specific to vacation rentals. <br />• 2014: The 2011 state law was modified to allow local regulation of vacation rentals but still pre- <br />empted local governments from prohibiting vacation rentals or regulating the duration or frequency of <br />vacation rentals. <br />M:\AGENDA\Current Year\2015\IO-13-15 Continued ParkingRegsVacRentalsOrdinance.docx <br />3 <br />93 <br />