My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/13/2015 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
10/13/2015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2018 10:09:00 AM
Creation date
6/20/2016 2:09:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/13/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
415
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County's definition of illuminate to be consistent with the state model and with other regional local <br /> jurisdictiins. <br /> With respect to interior lighting restrictions, the proposed revisions delete references to (just) windows <br /> "facing the ocean," and replaces it with "within line-of-sight of an observer on the beach," which <br /> eliminates inconsistencies within the current ordinance and brings the County regulations in line with <br /> state guidelines and with other jurisdictions. <br /> Including or Not Including Dunes in Area of Illumination Restrictions <br /> I <br /> When thel Board of County Commissioners directed staff to draft revisions to the sea turtle protection <br /> lighting regulations, that direction included a recommendation that the area of restricted illumination be <br /> extended beyond the beach and include the area of dunes as well. On that issue, staff's position is that <br /> including dunes in the area of illumination restrictions would: <br /> • Be inconsistent with the state model ordinance and with other local ordinances statewide, which <br /> consistently refer to the beach (only) and not to the dune as the area of restricted illumination. <br /> (Inclusion of the dune area does not appear to be necessary to provide adequate protection, based <br /> on the model ordinance); <br /> • Effectively eliminate the allowance of any lighting within or immediately adjacent to dune areas, <br /> such as dune crossover lighting or yard edge lighting, including low profile shielded luminaries <br /> inlor adjacent to dune areas; and <br /> • Be problematic from an enforcement access standpoint, in that the beach area is generally <br /> accepted as a public/accessible space and is the area of regular monitoring, whereas private dune <br /> areas are not. <br /> For those reasons, staff does not support inclusion of the dune in the area of restricted illumination. <br /> Moreover, the PZC voted at its hearing on June 11, 2015 to recommend the Board not include the dune <br /> area. Consequently,the proposed ordinance does not include dunes in the area of restricted illumination. <br /> i <br /> Other Proposed Revisions <br /> In drafting the ordinance amendment, staff has taken the opportunity to clarify certain sections of the <br /> code and to revise certain aspects beyond the definition of illuminate and how it is applied and measured. <br /> Those other revisions include: <br /> 1 <br /> • Clarification that tinted or filmed glass visible transmittance is measured from center-of-glass, <br /> consistent with the building code; and <br /> • Revisions to the "purpose" section to reference potential impacts of artificial lighting on adult <br /> se'a turtles as well as hatchlings, consistent with scientific findings, and to reference the County's <br /> Sea Turtle Habitat Conservation Plan; and <br /> • Revisions to beachfront lighting approval procedures to require building contractors to certify <br /> compliance with beachfront lighting standards, subject to inspection verification by county staff, <br /> consistent with building inspection procedures. <br /> 5 <br /> 136 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.