My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
04/05/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2025 11:08:43 AM
Creation date
6/21/2016 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dylan Remgold, County• Attorney <br />Wilham K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney <br />Kate Ptngolt Cotner, :assistant County Attorney <br />Consent Agenda - B. C.C. d 516 <br />Ofc of <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />ATTORNEY <br />VE <br />BACKGROUND. <br />In New York, a class action lawsuit titled In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation is pending <br />concerning allegations of price fixing in the sale of municipal derivative transactions by various <br />companies (the "Litigation"). Proposed settlements have been reached with many of the companies <br />named as defendants in the Litigation. In total, those defendants have agreed to pay $100 million for the <br />benefit of !the plaintiff class, which includes state, local and municipal governments that purchased <br />derivative transactions from one of the defendants or alleged co-conspirators at any time between January <br />1, 1992 and August 18, 2011 (the "Class"). The court in the Litigation will hold a hearing on July 8, 2016 <br />to consider) whether the settlements are fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class. A list of the financial <br />institutions that allegedly sold the municipal derivative transactions and the companies that allegedly <br />brokered the sale of the municipal derivative transactions is provided in the notice of settlement. <br />By May Ho 2016, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") has to decide <br />whether to stay in the Class or exclude itself from the Class. No action is required in order to stay in the <br />Class. If the Board decides to stay in the Class, Indian River County will have until July 28, 2016 to file a <br />claim. The 'Board also has the right to file an objection to the proposed settlement or attend the hearing on <br />July 8, 2016. If the Board decides to stay in the Class, the Board will relinquish its right to file a lawsuit <br />concerning the issues and claims at stake in the Litigation. <br />Approved for Apri15, 2016 BCC Meeting <br />Consent Agenda <br />COUNTY ATTORNEY <br />Indian River Co. A proved Date <br />Admin. 31 <br />Co. Atty. <br />Budget <br />Department - - - <br />Risk Management --- --- <br />F"Al-3MbIGEVOULIB C CA91nd-A11—'A1igp.1 Dlfi, rnar A4 Ling—d., 58 <br />j MEMORANDUM <br />TO: <br />? Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: <br />Dylan Reingold, County Attorney <br />DATE: <br />March 30, 2016 <br />SUBJECT: <br />In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation Class Action Lawsuit <br />BACKGROUND. <br />In New York, a class action lawsuit titled In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation is pending <br />concerning allegations of price fixing in the sale of municipal derivative transactions by various <br />companies (the "Litigation"). Proposed settlements have been reached with many of the companies <br />named as defendants in the Litigation. In total, those defendants have agreed to pay $100 million for the <br />benefit of !the plaintiff class, which includes state, local and municipal governments that purchased <br />derivative transactions from one of the defendants or alleged co-conspirators at any time between January <br />1, 1992 and August 18, 2011 (the "Class"). The court in the Litigation will hold a hearing on July 8, 2016 <br />to consider) whether the settlements are fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class. A list of the financial <br />institutions that allegedly sold the municipal derivative transactions and the companies that allegedly <br />brokered the sale of the municipal derivative transactions is provided in the notice of settlement. <br />By May Ho 2016, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") has to decide <br />whether to stay in the Class or exclude itself from the Class. No action is required in order to stay in the <br />Class. If the Board decides to stay in the Class, Indian River County will have until July 28, 2016 to file a <br />claim. The 'Board also has the right to file an objection to the proposed settlement or attend the hearing on <br />July 8, 2016. If the Board decides to stay in the Class, the Board will relinquish its right to file a lawsuit <br />concerning the issues and claims at stake in the Litigation. <br />Approved for Apri15, 2016 BCC Meeting <br />Consent Agenda <br />COUNTY ATTORNEY <br />Indian River Co. A proved Date <br />Admin. 31 <br />Co. Atty. <br />Budget <br />Department - - - <br />Risk Management --- --- <br />F"Al-3MbIGEVOULIB C CA91nd-A11—'A1igp.1 Dlfi, rnar A4 Ling—d., 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.