My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-096
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-096
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2016 10:12:45 AM
Creation date
8/8/2016 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
06/21/2016
Control Number
2016-096
Agenda Item Number
8.D.
Entity Name
Florida Department of Transportation
Subject
Construction of sidewalk and drainage modifications
Area
North side of 8th St. from 58th Ave. to 21st. Cout
Document Relationships
2016-055
(Attachment)
Path:
\Resolutions\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAP Performance Evaluation <br /> January 2016 <br /> Select One 5) The Agency provided a request for Department concurrence to award the project to the <br /> lowest responsive bidder.The Agency provided a bid tabulation and bid analysis(or other <br /> supporting documentation in the case of design/build projects). (Tied to LAP Manual, <br /> Chapter 21 Construction Advertising and Award Procedures) <br /> 1 The Agency did not request concurrence, or the Department had to prompt the agency <br /> for the request and associated documents multiple times. <br /> 2 The Agency requested concurrence and supplied all documents. Department had to <br /> request additional information to supplement the information provided. <br /> 3 The Agency requested concurrence and supplied all supporting documents without <br /> Department prompting. Documents supplied were sufficient and no additional <br /> information was needed to provide concurrence. <br /> select one 6) The Agency's submitted a final contract containing all federal and state requirements prior <br /> to contract execution. (Tied to Construction checklist) <br /> 1 The Agency's did not submit a final contract to the Department prior to contract <br /> execution. <br /> 2 The Agency's submitted a final contract to the Department prior to contract execution, <br /> but federal and/or state requirements were missing and a revision of the document was <br /> required. <br /> 3 The Agency's submitted a final contract containing all federal and state requirements to <br /> the Department prior to contract execution. <br /> Select One 7) The Agency uploaded required construction advertisement and award documents into <br /> LAPIT. Required documents include: bid tabulation, bid analysis,executed contract. <br /> 1 The Agency did not utilize LAPIT and/or required constant follow-up from the <br /> Department to use LAPIT. <br /> 2 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents with minimal prompting by the <br /> Department. <br /> 3 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents and data without prompts by the <br /> Department. <br /> Total 0 <br /> Count 0 <br /> Average NaN <br /> Construction <br /> Adverstisement <br /> and Award <br /> Comments <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.