My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-096
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-096
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2016 10:12:45 AM
Creation date
8/8/2016 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
06/21/2016
Control Number
2016-096
Agenda Item Number
8.D.
Entity Name
Florida Department of Transportation
Subject
Construction of sidewalk and drainage modifications
Area
North side of 8th St. from 58th Ave. to 21st. Cout
Document Relationships
2016-055
(Attachment)
Path:
\Resolutions\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' LAP Performance Evaluation <br /> January 2016 <br /> Select One 11) The Agency uploaded required construction documents into LAPIT. Required documents <br /> include: pre-construction meeting minutes, progress meetings, change orders, <br /> certifications, materials testing, and other relevant construction documents. <br /> 1 The Agency did not utilize LAPIT and/or required constant follow-up from the <br /> Department to use LAPIT. <br /> 2 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents with minimal prompting by the <br /> Department. <br /> 3 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents and data without prompts by the <br /> Department. <br /> select one 12) The Agency completed the project prior to the expiration of the LAP Agreement or <br /> requested a reasonable time extension. (Tied to LAP Agreement) <br /> 1 The Agency did not complete the project prior to agreement expiration. Delays to the <br /> schedule were not communicated to the Department. The Agency did not proactively <br /> request a time extension. <br /> 2 The Agency did not complete the project prior to the original agreement expiration, but <br /> communicated delays to the Department and proactively requested a time extension. <br /> 3 The Agency completed the project prior to agreement expiration. <br /> Select One 13) The Agency's Construction Contract Compliance Administration was successfully managed in <br /> accordance with the federal requirements. Project could be closed out within 120 days of <br /> project completion.The Department was notified by the Agency of any delays in <br /> Construction Contract Compliance Administration. <br /> 1 The Agency's Construction Contract Compliance Administration was not successfully <br /> managed, and the project could not be closed out within 120 days of project <br /> completion. <br /> 2 The Agency's Construction Contract Compliance Administration delayed project close <br /> out beyond 120 days of project completion, but the Agency notified the Department of <br /> a justifiable delay. <br /> 3 The Agency's Construction Contract Compliance Administration was completed such <br /> that the Project could be closed out within 120 days of project completion. <br /> Select One 14) The Agency's project close out documents were completed and submitted to the <br /> Department within 120 days of project completion.The Department was notified by the <br /> Agency of any delays in Construction Contract Compliance Administration. <br /> 1 Agency took more than 120 days to submit the project close out documents, without <br /> notifying the Department of the delay or having justifiable cause. <br /> 2 Agency took more than 120 days to submit the project close out documents, but <br /> notified the Department of a justifiable delay. <br /> 3 Agency took less than 120 days submit the project close out documents. <br /> Page 11 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.