My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/10/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
05/10/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2020 12:26:50 PM
Creation date
8/10/2016 12:23:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/10/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 22, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />When Florida Power and Light built the power plant in the 1970's, the Florida East Coast <br />Railroad moved a marginal amount of freight along this rail line. The company and rail corridor <br />are now owned by a hedge fund through an affiliate, and operations have changed and are <br />planned to change significantly. <br />The All Aboard Florida Project is designed not just to add high speed passenger rail between <br />Miami and Orlando, but also to add a second rail line and accommodate additional freight <br />through our area. <br />Over recent years, freight traffic has increased significantly and is still projected to double or <br />triple. Moreover, a number of hazardous materials have been added to the freight carried by the <br />railroad, including highly volatile ethanol, chlorine gas, anhydrous ammonia, and liquefied <br />propane gas. The US Department of Energy has granted approval to affiliated companies to <br />export liquefied natural gas by rail, and associated facilities are in development along the route. <br />(See the May 29, 2015, approval from the Department of Energy attached.) <br />Our communities and government agencies, particularly in this County and those to the <br />immediate north and south, have recognized the threat posed by the project and transmission of <br />hazardous materials going through densely populated areas along the East Coast. (See, for <br />example, Martin County's Emergency Services Division's study, also attached.) <br />Increasing freight and hazardous materials traffic, and adding 32 passenger trains per day <br />through the Treasure Coast and within two miles of the nuclear plant, seems to raise any number <br />of issues; and, we're concerned about its effect on the power plant. <br />The power plant is located on the barrier island which, itself, is heavily populated and which has <br />significant limitations on evacuation. There are additional populations also located on the <br />mainland, but still east of the railroad, so train issues could block evacuation. In the Village, one <br />stopped train could block the evacuation of most Village residents. All our communities have <br />major arteries, relatively close together, that could be blocked by a single stopped train. <br />We also note that, at the south end of the County, the rail bridge over the St. Lucie River is not <br />being replaced or double tracked, which would seem to create a choke point having major <br />implications for delivery of emergency services to the north and south, as well as evacuation <br />plans. <br />Moreover, with the plant located just two miles from the railway, and the transmission lines <br />passing directly above the tracks, operation of the plant could also be impacted by an accident <br />involving release of gas or chemicals, or an explosion. <br />va-lr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.