Laserfiche WebLink
15194 Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 55/Tuesday, March 22, 2016/Proposed Rules <br />environment, public health or safety, or <br />State, local or tribal governments or <br />communities. <br />(4) This rule does not alter the <br />budgetary effects of existing <br />entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan <br />programs or the rights or obligations of <br />their recipients. <br />(5) This rule does not raise novel legal <br />or policy issues arising out of legal <br />mandates, the President's priorities, or <br />the principles set forth in E.O. 12866. <br />Improving Regulation and Regulatory <br />Review (E.O. 13563) <br />Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the <br />principles of E.O. 12866 while calling <br />for improvements in the nation's <br />regulatory system to promote <br />predictability, reduce uncertainty, and <br />use the best, most innovative, and least <br />burdensome tools for achieving <br />regulatory ends. The executive order <br />directs agencies to consider regulatory <br />approaches that reduce burdens and <br />maintain flexibility and freedom of <br />choice for the public where these <br />approaches are relevant, feasible, and <br />consistent with regulatory objectives. <br />E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that <br />regulations must be based on the best <br />available science and that the <br />rulemaking process must allow for <br />public participation and an open <br />exchange of ideas. BOEM has developed <br />this rule in a manner consistent with <br />these requirements. <br />Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) <br />BOEM certifies this proposed rule <br />would not have a significant economic <br />effect on a substantial number of small <br />entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et <br />seq.). A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis <br />is not required. Small public entities <br />affected by this rulemaking may be <br />cities, counties, towns, townships, <br />villages or special districts, with a <br />population of less than 50,000. Small <br />entities are occasionally parties to an <br />agreement for the use of OCS sand, <br />gravel and shell resources. Over the last <br />two decades, BOEM has issued nearly <br />50 leases or MOAs with 22 parties, of <br />which 5 were small public entities. Four <br />out of the 5 small public entities <br />received significant Federal cost -shares <br />to conduct beach nourishment projects. <br />The proposed application and <br />monitoring requirements. are necessary <br />to comply with Federal law and provide <br />BOEM and the public the best <br />information on the changes in the sand <br />borrow areas. Since BOEM is not <br />proposing any material changes to the <br />longstanding requirements for <br />borrowing OCS sand, gravel and shell <br />resources, this rulemaking will not have <br />a substantial effect on small entities. <br />The Small Business and Agriculture <br />Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman <br />and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were <br />established to receive comments from <br />small businesses about Federal agency <br />enforcement actions. The Ombudsman <br />will annually evaluate the enforcement <br />activities and rate each agency's <br />responsiveness to small business. If you <br />wish to comment on the actions of <br />BOEM enforcement activities, you may <br />call 1-888-734-3247. You may <br />comment to the Small Business <br />Administration without fear of <br />retaliation. Allegations of <br />discrimination/retaliation filed with the <br />Small Business Administration will be <br />investigated for appropriate action. <br />Small Business Regulatory Enforcement <br />Fairness Act (SBREFA) <br />This proposed rule is not a major rule <br />under the SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). <br />This proposed rule: <br />(a) Would not have an annual effect <br />on the economy of $100 million or <br />more; <br />(b) Would not cause a major increase <br />in costs or prices for consumers, <br />individual industries, Federal, State, or <br />local government agencies, or <br />geoaphic regions; and, <br />(cWould not have significant adverse <br />effects on competition, employment, <br />investment, productivity, innovation, or <br />the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to <br />compete with foreign-based enterprises. <br />Unfunded Mandates Reform Act <br />This proposed rule would not impose <br />an unfunded mandate on Staie, local, or <br />tribal governments or the private sector <br />of more than $100 million per year. A <br />statement containing the information <br />required by Unfunded Mandates Reform <br />Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not <br />required. <br />Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. <br />12630) <br />Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this <br />proposed rule would not have <br />significant takings implications. The <br />proposed rule is not a governmental <br />action capable of interference with <br />constitutionally protected property <br />rights. A Takings Implication <br />Assessment is not required. <br />Federalism (E.O. 13132) <br />Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this <br />proposed rule would not have sufficient <br />federalism implications to warrant the <br />preparation of a Federalism Assessment. <br />This proposed rule would not <br />substantially and directly affect the <br />relationship between the Federal and <br />State and local governments. To the <br />extent that State and local governments <br />have a role in OCS activities, this <br />proposed rule would not affect that role <br />A Federalism Assessment is not <br />required. <br />Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) <br />This rule would comply with the <br />requirements of E.O. 12988. <br />Specifically, this rule would: <br />(a) Meet the criteria of section 3(a) <br />requiring that all regulations be <br />reviewed to eliminate errors and <br />ambiguity and be written to minimize <br />litigation; and, <br />(b) Meet the criteria of section 3(b)(2) <br />requiring that all regulations be written <br />in clear language and contain clear legal <br />standards. <br />Consultation With Indian Tribes (E O. <br />13175) <br />The U.S. Department of the Interior <br />(DOI) strives to strengthen its <br />government -to -government relationship <br />with Indian tribes through a <br />commitment to consultation with Indian <br />tribes and recognition of their right to <br />self governance and tribal sovereignty. <br />BOEM's Tribal Liaison Officer has <br />certified that this regulation does not <br />have tribal implications as defined in <br />section 1(a) of E.O. 13175 and has <br />determined that the regulation.does not <br />have substantial and direct effects on <br />Federally recognized tribes or any <br />Alaska Native Corporation established <br />pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims <br />Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. <br />1601 et seq. <br />As it relates to any Federally <br />recognized Indian tribe, this proposed <br />rule merely formalizes existing policies <br />and procedures that govern the use of <br />OCS sand, gravel and shell resources. <br />The existing policies, procedures, <br />consultations and monitoring <br />requirements for the noncompetitive use <br />of sand, gravel and shell resources are <br />longstanding and have remained <br />relatively consistent for two decades. If <br />BOEM determines an individual project - <br />authorized under this part may -have <br />effects on Federally recognized tribes or <br />any Alaska Native Corporation, BOEM <br />will initiate consultation.as soon as <br />possible consistent with E.O. 13175 and <br />DOI tribal consultation policies. A tribe <br />may also.request BOEM initiate <br />consultation pursuant to E.O. 13175. <br />Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 <br />This proposed rule contains a new <br />collection of information request that is <br />being submitted to OMB for review and <br />approval under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. <br />The rule proposes to add a new part 583 <br />to address the use of OCS sand, gravel <br />and shell resources for shore protection <br />or replenishment, wetland restoration, <br />121 <br />