Laserfiche WebLink
7. Revise the areas proposed co be slow speed outside of and east <br />of the Intracoastal Waterway channel (and 100' buffers), from <br />the Wabasso Causeway to the south county line, to be slow <br />speed within 100' of the lagoon east (barrier island) <br />shoreline, with the remaining area (between the 100' east <br />shoreline slow speed buffer and the Intracoastal Waterway <br />channel 100' buffer) to be 20 m.p.h. maximum speed. This <br />proposed revision does not apply to recreation use areas and <br />proposed idle speed areas. <br />In addition to the above recommendations, although not included in <br />the motion that was unanimously approved, there appeared to be a <br />strong consensus among those at the MANWAC meeting that there is a <br />need for mandatory boater education requirements (and boating <br />registration)... with regard to manatee protection and boating safety. <br />Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. <br />1 Underlined text represents changes/additions to MANWAC's <br />original recommendations of May 11, 1992. <br />Allen Edwards, 18 Tarpon Drive, member of Concerned Boaters of <br />Indian River County, came before the Board to make additional <br />recommendations to the State Manatee Protection Proposal. He felt <br />this undertaking has come a long way. It is not everything the <br />boaters want, it is not what the Manatee Club wants, so no one is <br />getting everything they want. He spoke of having a 2 -hour meeting <br />with Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Environmental <br />Administrator Pat Rose, at which time the boaters listed several <br />items they felt were wrong with the recommendations. Mr. Edwards <br />advised that his group had no problem with anything north of <br />Wabasso Island. The first change they would like to see is at <br />Hobart Landing, which is about 5 miles from the Intracoastal <br />Waterway (ICW). They recommend that the marked channel should be <br />30 mph so that boaters can get to the ICW. The second suggestion <br />regards waterskiers, and Mr. Edwards felt the area between Hole in <br />the Wall Island and the Gifford Cut should be unregulated for <br />waterskiers year-round. He said it is outside the channel, it is <br />very deep water, and the powerline makes a normal identifiable <br />boundary, all of which makes it a fairly sheltered area for <br />waterskiers. Mr. Edwards suggested that the access to Johns Island <br />should be 30 mph because it is shallow and boats need to be able to <br />get up on a step, or up on a plane, to get over that shallow water. <br />His next point was regarding the area of the Barber Bridge. He <br />realized that the reason for a "No Wake" zone south of the bridge <br />was because of erosion to Memorial Island Park, but he thought that <br />zone should not be tied to the cause of the manatees. He suggested <br />that the City of Vero Beach could pass an ordinance to limit the <br />speed south of the Bridge. He felt a "No Wake" zone is not <br />27 <br />JUL 07 1992 <br />