7/7/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M or appraised value, any of which would change our estimated costs. Commissioner Scurlock foresaw difficulty in selling this bond issue to the public because of the tough economic times. He felt that many people who ordinarily would support this type bond referendum would not be able to support it now if they have difficulty supporting their families. He stressed that these issues are not really part of the recommendation but will have to be addressed, and there is a need for a process of educating the public. Chairman Eggert pointed out that the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAO) and staff, with the approval of the Commission, designed this brochure as an information sheet. It will be used by everyone to publicize the referendum, including various clubs and organizations, and everyone will work with the same information. Commissioner Scurlock was concerned that the public understand that the referendum does not mention a minimum amount. We are going to issue general obligations not to exceed .5 mill, but whether this bond referendum passes or not there is a Comprehensive Land Use requirement for acquisition of property which will occur either by bond issue or by the County Commission voting a millage to go out and purchase land. He wanted the brochure to include language to explain that we are going to raise enough money out of this issue, if it is successful, to meet that requirement under the Comp Plan. County Attorney Charles Vitunac advised that this referendum is not to put a restriction on the power of the County. It is just to authorize ad valorem tax. The County Commission has the full power to spend less if it wants to, and this referendum should not be a restriction on that. Even if the Board has this authority, we do not have to spend any of it. Chairman Eggert and Commissioner Scurlock agreed that we should stress that point. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of state and federal matching funds for the purpose of purchasing property. Commissioner Wheeler led discussion on quality of life. He noted that many communities form homeowners associations for the purpose of beautifying their neighborhoods. They realize that this is an asset to Indian River County. Commissioner Wheeler also pointed out that the voters will have the opportunity to voice their approval or objection. Commissioner Scurlock stressed that if the bond referendum fails, the requirement to fund acquisition of property remains. Commissioner Wheeler agreed that we as taxpayers are going to pay for it whether in a general obligation bond or general millage rate, but he felt the proposal is comprehensive and is a good plan. 43 WWI Lk00K. bb Fhtr3{.