My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/21/2016 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
06/21/2016 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2020 1:27:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 11:15:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/21/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed fine schedule for violations of county vacation rental and commercial events at <br />residences regulations is attached (see attachment 12). <br />Recommended "Progress Report" <br />As a final matter for discussion, the STVRAC considered the benefits of a "progress report" <br />evaluation of the proposed vacation rental ordinance after adoption and implementation. Committee <br />members expressed a desire for staff to perform an evaluation and provide a "progress report" to the <br />Board as a public discussion item one to two years after ordinance adoption. In the end, the <br />committee decided to recommend that the Board direct staff to present a "progress report" to the <br />Board 1 year after adoption of the vacation rental ordinance. At its April 12 meeting, Board <br />members indicated general agreement with the committee's recommendation. Consequently, staff <br />has incorporated into the recommended motion a directive for staff to prepare and present a progress <br />report one year after adoption of the vacation rental ordinance. In addition, the PZC supports the <br />progress report directive. <br />Establishing Application Fee for IRC Vacation Rental License <br />In an effort to establish an appropriate application review fee for the local vacation rental license, <br />staff looked at simple recovery of anticipated average staff costs per application. The approach of <br />limiting fee amounts to simple recovery of staff costs has been the normal method used for <br />establishing development application review fees. <br />With respect to the proposed vacation rental local license, no formal site plan review will be <br />conducted but application information will be verified by staff and staff will coordinate with affected <br />departments (e.g. Health Department, Clerk of Court). That type of review should be similar to the <br />work staff performs for the review and issuance of an "average" temporary use permit (TUP). The <br />current TUP application fee is $75.00. As currently proposed, staff anticipates an average of two <br />hours of code officer inspection time per license application which equates to a total inspection cost <br />of $100 ($50/hr). <br />Finally, staff anticipates costs to the County for consulting services that provide updated site-specific <br />information on vacation rentals at an estimated cost of $25 per unit per year. For a 3 year license (as <br />currently proposed), a total $75 per unit should be recovered for 3 years' worth of consultant data <br />costs. Consequently, staff believes an appropriate formula for establishing an application fee is as <br />follows: <br />$75 (TUP fee amount) + $100 (two hours code officer inspection costs) + $75 (consultant <br />data costs) = $250 license application fee <br />Based on the analysis above, staff proposes a 3 year license fee of $250. That fee amount is <br />incorporated into the attached fee resolution (see attachment 15). <br />MAAGENDA\Current Year\2016\Consideration of Proposed Vacation Rental Ordinance Establishing Local License Requirement and 13 <br />Vacation Rental Regulations 0621 l6.docx <br />135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.