Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 86 f'hu <br />Jut 0 8 1991 <br />Community Development Director Robert Keating explained that <br />this is a county initiated request to rezone approximately 210,364 <br />acres of land within the unincorporated portion of Indian River <br />County. The purpose of this request is to rezone all parcels which <br />currently have zoning classifications inconsistent with their <br />corresponding land use designations. Those parcels proposed for <br />rezoning are shown on attachment 4 of staff's recommendation. <br />Director Keating advised that staff has tried diligently to <br />notify all the people who would be affected by this rezoning. We <br />have sent out two mailings to every property owner who is affected <br />by this. The first mailing notified the property owners of a <br />hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the second <br />mailing notified them of this public hearing and the next public <br />hearing scheduled for July 21, 1992 at 5:01 o'clock P.M. <br />With each one of the mailings we included, as part of the label, <br />the tax I. D. number of that person's property so that if that <br />person contacted us, we could determine immediately which parcel it <br />was. We also notified people in the first letter that we were <br />having a staff workshop on this issue prior to the Planning & <br />Zoning Commission meeting, and 40-50 people attended that meeting <br />and asked questions. For awhile there, staff probably was <br />handling 30-40 inquiries a day, so we have discussed this matter <br />with quite a few people throughout the process. <br />Director Keating pointed out the general areas being affected <br />by the rezoning proposal, noting that much of the area affected is <br />west of I-95. In many cases where parcels are partly zoned <br />residential and partly zoned commercial, they are being put into <br />one zoning district, either residential or commercial. He <br />emphasized that State law mandates that the zoning of every parcel <br />in the county must be consistent with the land use designation in <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. He noted that the Board does not <br />have a lot of alternatives in relation to this, but if the Board <br />sees there are some proposed changes that do not appear to be <br />warranted, the Board could do the rezoning and then direct that a <br />land use amendment be done. He then reviewed the changes <br />recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission. <br />Director Keating advised that based upon the analysis <br />performed, staff recommends that the Board consider this proposal <br />to administratively rezone the subject parcels as shown on <br />Attachment 4; provide direction to staff; and announce its <br />intention to make a final decision on this matter at the second <br />public hearing on July 21, 1992 at 5:01 P.M. <br />Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />W <br />