My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/2016 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
08/16/2016 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2018 10:57:42 AM
Creation date
10/25/2016 1:02:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
08/16/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
806
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Adjacent to the multi -staged LEAPSTM system, we will construct a non -sloped, PEARO <br />system with an identical flow rate (Figure Al). The value of operating an attached al- <br />gae system in parallel with the LEAP STM system is that the County has historical expe- <br />rience and data from operating large-scale attached algae systems. Therefore, the da- <br />ta from the NRC PEARO system will allow comparisons of algae production and algae - <br />based nutrient removal efficacy across sites in the county (eg., Osprey and Egret <br />Marsh ATS® systems). Further, it will allow site -controlled, internal comparisons of wa- <br />ter treatment efficacy between a multi -plant, multi -stage LEAPSTm and an attached al- <br />gae platform. <br />Although the PEARO system is an algae -based system, it has several advantages rel- <br />ative to ATS® systems since the weir -based, non -sloped configuration is intrinsically <br />robust and will maintain a healthy algae crop in the event that pumping is interrupted. <br />This results in a system that is amenable to lower energy, non -continuous pumping <br />strategies (eg, daytime pumping only), while still maintaining equivalent rates of algae <br />growth relative to traditional sloped attached algae systems (experimentally deter- <br />mined by VEN in side-by-side study). <br />In addition to the materials for the construction of the pilot system itself, during Stage <br />1 we will have a fence and camera installed to ensure security of the site. Informative <br />signage will be placed for safety considerations and to notify the public of the objec- <br />tives and goals of the project (Appendix A2). <br />Key deliverables for this stage (see Table 1) include: 1) a written confirmation that the <br />selected pilot site is acceptable, 2) a report on the water quality and settleable solids <br />characteristics and 3) a written report detailing the pilot site construction (pilot system, <br />office, fence, etc) and confirmation that the pilot is operational and secured. <br />5 268 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.