Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1 Moisture Readings <br /> Moisture Moisture <br /> Location Time (approx.) (Tramex) (Delmhorst) Moisture (IR Camera) <br /> Ready Room (IR screen) 1:30 PM — — No moisture indicated <br /> Office (SW Corner) 2:00 PM — 0.7- 1.1 — <br /> Office (SW Corner, V x 1' 2:45 PM 20% - 100% — — <br /> area) (background = 0.0) <br /> 1s' Dormitory(IR Screen) 3:00 PM — — No moisture indicated <br /> New Addition Dormitory 3:40 PM — — No moisture indicated <br /> (IR Screen) <br /> Kitchen (IR Screen) 3:50 PM — — No moisture indicated <br /> North Wing–Captain 4:18 PM — — No moisture indicated <br /> Office, Hallway, all rooms <br /> Table 2 Swab Sample Results <br /> Sample Location Observed Mold Types <br /> Ready Room (IRC-5) Cladosporium–Very Heavy Growth <br /> Office S. (IRC-6) Curvularia–Very Light Growth <br /> Office SW(IRC-7) Penicillium/Aspergillus–Very Heavy Growth <br /> Office betw. Battalion Chief and Capt. Office N (IRC-8) Penicillium–Very Heavy Growth <br /> Batt. Chief(IRC-9) Penicillium–Very Heavy Growth <br /> Entry (IRC-10) Penicillium/Aspergillus–Heavy Growth <br /> Stachybotris–Very Heavy Growth <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: <br /> • Amec Foster Wheeler observed limited areas with Station 1 with water staining, water damage <br /> and limited areas of mold growth as confirmed by surface swab testing. Some issues in the <br /> building have been addressed as recommended in Amec Foster Wheeler's 2014 assessment <br /> report, and some remain to be completed. Amec Foster Wheeler understands that IRC is in <br /> process of addressing remaining areas in need of repair or remediation. Assessment methods <br /> by ESI were generally observed to be typical of an engineering investigation. <br /> 6 <br />