My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-188A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-188A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 11:35:28 AM
Creation date
12/1/2016 11:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
11/08/2016
Control Number
2016-188A
Agenda Item Number
8.J.
Entity Name
Timothy Rose Contracting Inc.
Subject
Contract & specifications
8th St. Sidewalk Improvements
Area
58th Ave. to 21st Ct.
Project Number
1049
Bid Number
2017009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
agreed to in writing, the Application for Payment subsequent tests called for in the Contract <br /> shall also be accompanied by a bill of sale, Documents, to a final determination of <br /> invoice, or other documentation warranting that quantities and classifications for Unit Price <br /> OWNER has received the materials and equip- Work under paragraph 9.08, and to any <br /> ment free and clear of all Liens and evidence other qualifications stated in the <br /> that the materials and equipment are covered recommendation); and <br /> by appropriate property insurance or other <br /> arrangements to protect OWNER's interest c. The conditions precedent to <br /> therein, all of which must be satisfactory to CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such <br /> OWNER. payment appear to have been fulfilled in so <br /> far as it is ENGINEER's responsibility to <br /> 2. Beginning with the second observe the Work. <br /> Application for Payment, each Application shall <br /> include an affidavit of CONTRACTOR stating 3. By recommending any such <br /> that all previous progress payments received payment ENGINEER will not thereby be <br /> on account of the Work have been applied on deemed to have represented that: (i) inspec- <br /> account to discharge CONTRACTOR's tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br /> legitimate obligations associated with prior of the Work as it has been performed have <br /> Applications for Payment. been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of <br /> the Work in progress, or involved detailed <br /> 3. The amount of retainage with respect inspections of the Work beyond the responsi- <br /> to progress payments will be as stipulated in bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in <br /> the Agreement. the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there may <br /> not be other matters or issues between the <br /> B. Review of Applications parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be <br /> paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER <br /> 1. ENGINEER will, within 10 days after to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR. <br /> receipt of each Application for Payment, either <br /> indicate in writing a recommendation of 4. Neither ENGINEER's review of <br /> payment and present the Application to CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of <br /> OWNER or return the Application to recommending payments nor ENGINEER's <br /> CONTRACTOR indicating in writing recommendation of any payment, including final <br /> ENGINEER's reasons for refusing to payment, will impose responsibility on <br /> recommend payment. In the latter case, CON- ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or control the <br /> TRACTOR may make the necessary Work or for the means, methods, techniques, <br /> corrections and resubmit the Application. sequences, or procedures of construction, or <br /> the safety precautions and programs incident <br /> 2. ENGINEER's recommendation of thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to <br /> any payment requested in an Application for comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> Payment will constitute a representation by CONTRACTOR's performance of the Work. <br /> ENGINEER to OWNER, based on Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to <br /> executed Work as an experienced and qualified make any examination to ascertain how or for <br /> design professional and on ENGINEER's what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, <br /> accompanying data and schedules, that to the or to determine that title to any of the Work, <br /> best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information materials, or equipment has passed to <br /> and belief: OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point 5. ENGINEER may refuse to recom- <br /> indicated; mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br /> in ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect to <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in make the representations to OWNER referred <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents to in paragraph 14.02.8.2. ENGINEER may <br /> (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a also refuse to recommend any such payment <br /> functioning whole prior to or upon or, because of subsequently discovered <br /> Substantial Completion, to the results of any evidence or the results of subsequent <br /> 00700-General Conditions REV 5-10-13 <br /> 00700-39 <br /> F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1049_8th St Sidewalk Improvements(58th Ave to 21 st Court)\Admim\bid doC rnents\LAP DocurnentsWaster Contract <br /> Docunenls\00700-General Conditions REV 5-10-13.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.