My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/04/2016
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
03/04/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 11:10:16 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 12:03:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/04/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is important to note that adoption of the proposed land use amendment will not impact any public <br />Compatibility with the Surroundine Area <br />Under the requested C-1 land use designation, there will be no development on the subject <br />properties, except for minor facilities associated with passive recreation activities. For that reason, <br />the subject request will enhance compatibility between the subject site and surrounding land uses. In <br />terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetics, the impacts associated with uses allowed under the proposed <br />C-1 land use designation will be significantly less than those that would occur with development <br />under the existing land use designations.- In fact, the passive recreational usesallowedunder the <br />requested zoning district will serve as an amenity for nearby residential uses. <br />For those reasons, staff has determined that the requested land use amendment is compatible with the <br />surrounding area. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />The site's existing land use designations offer only limited environmental protection. Given the <br />residential and -Conservation -2 land use designations of the subject property, developmentonthe <br />sites would be required to preserve only 10 or 15 percent of the upland habitat. In contrast, the <br />proposed land use designation will preserve the entire area of the site, and development will be <br />limited to conservation and compatible passive recreational uses. By prohibiting most types of <br />development on the site, the proposed request will ensure that the environmental quality of the <br />property will be preserved. <br />For those reasons, the proposed land use amendment will positively impact the environmental quality <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of <br />the comprehensive plan. As county code, the "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such <br />a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan." Amendments must also show consistency <br />with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan which identify actions the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development related decisions, including plan amendment decisions. <br />While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability <br />than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability for this request are <br />SmeadSoft Reprint Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 - 11:55:37 - BCC:1625, Attachment Id t, page 154 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.