Laserfiche WebLink
A channelized crossing consists of a more normal 2 gate crossing; each gate positioned tostop <br />vehicles from entering the crossing on either side of the tracks, and a barrier strip perpendicular <br />to the track between opposing traffic lanes. The barrier must be of sufficient length and height, <br />that it prevents vehicles from going around the gates when they are in the closed position. In <br />other words the vehicles are held captive in the channel until the gates open. <br />Channelized crossings have a cost much closer to that of a regular crossing. <br />Crossings with one-way traffic probably would not need special gates at all, since a single gate <br />can easily block the entire road way and there is no opposing vehicular traffic. <br />In fact, whenever a signal controlled intersection is near a crossing and feeds traffic to that <br />crossing, that signal is can be tied into the railroad signaling system. The signal will give <br />preference to the train over road vehicles and is used to prohibit feeding traffic to the crossing <br />when the gates are down. This couldalsobe an important part of some crossing deesigns. <br />So, the upshot is: the cost of crossings for a hornless system may be much less costly than <br />previously estimated if channelized crossings can be used. <br />Also, regardless of who pays for a hornless railroad crossings within their city limits, the city is <br />responsible for applying for a hornless permit from the FRA. The actual design of each crossing <br />in the town will be scored by the FRA by way of a safety evaluation process. A hornless permit <br />will be granted or denied based on the evaluation. Hornless permits must be renewed <br />periodically by the town. (I think it is every five years.) In my opinion the hornless crossing <br />must be designed with the design cooperation of the railroad due to the detailed tie-ins required <br />between the railroad communications and signaling system. - <br />If you'd like to read the rules for Hornless Crossings, see the 103 page: 49 CFR Parts 222 & 229, <br />"Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway Rail Grade Crossings. Interim Final Rule 12/18/2003 <br />Now, let's get back to basics. <br />I suggest that the county needs to take a step back for a minute and look at the overall situation. <br />The railroad company has a mission to build the railroad as fast as it can at the lowest possible <br />cost so it can begin revenue service. As you may have seen, any requests that don't fit within <br />these parameters are summarily dismissed. This is not intended to be a criticism of the railroad's <br />methods of operation. It is just a fact. <br />The county has a mission to do the best job it can to protect its citizens and minimize the impacts <br />on the residents' quality of life while doing the best job to provide for their safety. <br />Therefore, the railroad's mission and the county's mission are not necessarily the same. <br />173.ti <br />SmeadSoft Reprint Date: Wednesday, December 14,2016 11:57:32 BCC 1825, Attachment Id 1, Page 183 <br />4G.7? L19 V41 "19"Scist"I J"316cr, 1 vu"e a uI <br />