My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/11/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
06/11/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:26:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 1:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/11/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table A-3 <br />Residents per Housing Unit (Unincorporated IRC) <br />Housing Type <br />Single Family (detached) <br />- Less than 1,000 sf <br />- 1,000 to 1,499sf <br />- 1,500 to 2,499 sf <br />- 2,500 sf or greater <br />Multi-Family/Accessory <br />Mobile Home <br />Weighted Average <br />Populationi'i <br />52,420 <br />Housing <br />Units(2) <br />20,997 <br />14,195 <br />7,454 <br />74,069 <br />9,923 <br />5,378 <br />36,298 <br />Ratio <br />87% <br />94% <br />100% <br />Residents / <br />Housing <br />Units(4) <br />2.50 <br />2.18 <br />2.35 <br />2.50 <br />2.78 <br />1.43 <br />1.39 <br />2.04 <br />Residents / <br />Housing Units <br />with 2010 Adjisi <br />2.33 <br />2.03 <br />2.19 <br />2.33 <br />2.59 <br />1.33 <br />1.30 <br />1.90 <br />(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) <br />(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 <br />(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey <br />(4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) <br />(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the <br />decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 <br />Table A-4 <br />• <br />Kesuaents per Housing unit (IKC. exciuding <br />Inman River snores) <br />Housing Type <br />Single Family (detached) <br />it <br />81,290 <br />Housing <br />Units(2) <br />33,010 <br />Ratio(3) <br />Residents / <br />Housing <br />Units(4) <br />2.46 <br />Residents / <br />HousingUnits <br />with 2010Adjisi <br />2.29 <br />- Less than 1,000 sf <br />87% <br />2.14 <br />1.99 <br />-1,000 to 1,499 sf <br />94% <br />2.31 <br />2.15 <br />-1,500 to 2,499 sf <br />100% <br />2.46 <br />2.29 <br />- 2,500 sf or greater <br />111% <br />2.73 <br />2.54 <br />Multi-Family/Accessory <br />21,493 <br />15,176 <br />1.42 <br />1.32 <br />Mobile Home <br />10,516 <br />6,786 <br />1.55 <br />1.44 <br />Weighted Average <br />113,299 <br />54,972 <br />2.06 <br />1.92 <br />(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) <br />(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 <br />(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey <br />(4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) <br />(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the <br />decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 <br />Functional Population <br />Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted <br />methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for <br />certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including <br />residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />June 2014 <br />A-4 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.