My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/11/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
06/11/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:26:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 1:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The methodology used to develop the full calculated fees and affordable growth fees is <br />documented throughout this report. The staff scenarios shown in Table ES -3 as well as <br />Appendix K represent the County's preferred alternative and follow the affordable growth <br />calculations, with the exception of the following policy decisions primarily based on a <br />review of capital needs in the near future: <br />• Adoption of maximum calculated fees for emergency services <br />• Application of a 50 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public <br />buildings impact fees for all land uses <br />• Application of a 25 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and <br />recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses <br />• Suspension of the library impact fees <br />Of these, parks and recreation and libraries impact fees are charged only to residential land <br />uses while the emergency services and public buildings impact fees are charged to both <br />residential and non-residential land uses. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />June 2014 <br />ES -4 Impact Fee Update Study <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.