Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNT III <br />For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Relating to <br />the City's Non -Compliance with Section 366.04(7), Florida Statutes <br />71. This count is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief by the Plaintiffs <br />against the City relating to the City's failure to comply with Section 366.04(7), Florida Statutes. <br />72. Plaintiffs adopt paragraphs 1 through 44 as if set forth fully herein. <br />73. The City's electric utility is managed and its electric rates are set exclusively by <br />the City's Council Members who are elected by the citizens who reside inside the City's limits. <br />74. Approximately 65% of the City's electric customers are not "residents" of the <br />City, cannot as a matter of law vote in City elections, and thus have no voice in electing those <br />officials that manage the City's electric utility and set their electric rates. Plaintiffs are part of this <br />disenfranchised portion of the City's electric customers. <br />• 75. Section 366.04(7), Florida Statutes, was passed to provide non-resident customers <br />• <br />of small municipal electric utilities, such as the Plaintiffs, a voice in electing the governing board <br />of their electric utility. Section 366.04(7) requires each "affected municipal electric utility" to <br />conduct a referendum election of all of its retail electric customers (both inside and outside the <br />municipal limits) to determine if a majority of the customers are in favor of creating a separate <br />electric utility authority whose governing board shall proportionately represent Resident and <br />Non -Resident Customers. <br />76. For purposes of Section 366.04(7), "affected municipal electric utility" means a <br />municipal electric utility which serves two cities in the same non -charter county, does not serve <br />outside of its home county, and which had between 30,000 and 35,000 retail electric customers <br />on September 30, 2007. <br />17 <br />