|
Proposed Budget Comparison by Fund
<br />Fiscal Year 2015/16 and 2016/17
<br />Fund Number and Description
<br />1SolidMAt6_Dis-*al
<br />FY 2015/16
<br />;Budget @
<br />3/31/16-
<br />FY 2016/17
<br />Department I
<br />Requests
<br />FY 2016/17
<br />proposed Budget
<br />Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />%Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />b `C #:{;;xa'i.�r+":" _yqv^ vjxrTrFrS�R{"n'Cp6'.yy3S!ra�_Cw"+r' •,�,';c�,:i+aC;. ,m.".'
<br />!x-S.Y.!': =':4. .:� i!. YiS
<br />_ .st ,�_,``r�t 'I�+i
<br />- 'ri, F�"v�' - 2 �J�'J.
<br />55•Atl Va orem•FT((axm Funtls���:�� �> ��, }�,�.;�,
<br />F_�•..-�,...__4.....v_,._.Jf55.._..-...-...-_.,...._.M1.•r.J_�:W•:4"-;"lif.:r..��»,�w,%�1ni�^�_.,leek.'�Te53:Nw:����1i'��?��>�r"i�'z�?�H�4iwiiYi1�-;iir.^'iii'�5:.4.,'�'•''r.Y'-.-��.i'•#.��V'v�anx�.i�.��•i••�
<br />. _ _
<br />1l' `, ra�ena 1 lei SYeG
<br />rF ,3 k''S;t; v,;Y:i -'.=.a` •34:i`iN�=may S.a "a<-"3 ,sr s'^-�yMR 4ri„'-b.T;aF.c•
<br />^�u+�� ._R,,�i7J-1" ,�. Z: i r Lf {�'.. � `.wi ;k13 � . ,i'W.1:5, Se���1�.tiG� �'_•.� �P 3" ."ry �in•
<br />,v����.}� �,�7 .���T�+���,�-�.::� * `���r�s fi a_x.-.a��;.s
<br />•,lh
<br />001
<br />General Fund--
<br />$81,405,203
<br />$84,576,422
<br />$81,182,145
<br />($223,058)
<br />(0.27)%
<br />004:
<br />Municipal Service Taxing Unit Fund
<br />26,699,660
<br />28,175,559
<br />30,395,064
<br />•, 3,695,404
<br />13.84%
<br />111
<br />Transportation Fund
<br />14,446,303
<br />16,712,195
<br />14,944,450
<br />498,147
<br />3.45%
<br />114
<br />Emergency Services District
<br />36,671,961
<br />36,281,132
<br />34,331,941'
<br />(2,340,020)
<br />(6.38)%
<br />-245__
<br />2004,Land Acquisition Bonds
<br />4,537,636
<br />'4,553,093
<br />4,545,134
<br />7,498
<br />0.17%
<br />Total,,= -Ad Valorem Tazing Funds:
<br />$1631760,763
<br />1,$1791294,461 1,
<br />$165,398,734
<br />$1,637,971
<br />:1.00 %
<br />i�p 1,,,p,:;:` ;,. ,r n -:was G•..r,,rk'n rY,"! -'r' ., rvy '"tigV: _ - �'� <-3 . - - air ^ al.HE
<br />a: .t` K,. -
<br />4%'-YnC,E!T5 n�'l'(� � q ..�u., ,S aT"(1'i'''. t ab' l W�.aA»: A. 'X �, _
<br />4 ' b :7� •F`1_�..}l l.e ''T- i'�i :`..:-=- "'{ !'.r.S ILL
<br />( �Cr�
<br />:SolitllWas�e Des ' osa/ D►s'frrc �.. _ ., @A%. g
<br />.,..._...... _-.._.-....., ,......,�.." -•t6a: n_..._ qua Ka._ - y;Y�:�a�:,, .��..f�r..-.-"`r"�m.- " ,n.�"'.
<br />R-.. _. 1_.•r_...,_...i k_, - Ym:`;+ it ��.n' L
<br />District _
<br />"y
<br />:,.$13,137,435
<br />_.$13,144,778
<br />;,:$13,141,095.
<br />' =_,.$3,660
<br />0,03 %
<br />.t
<br />r"5 - --.• •r'.F4". - uy,j.. " t n : i "- �,g. - .=rc b y.✓ : - . 'r s ..1.. ..r. -
<br />+v"3'+`: i'S'�� jT'�4"`�¢:.d4`: -y1v._;.
<br />�rb.i kP fii= .,'] ii}C., :Y.%..r te' .4Z�,.�.n,7114 '1`1"x' E1;¢"tihe.1' T Ute.{. L Y - .t;:1•i,.i eq. Fp :pr. p�{,,_.f'�',y4 -%
<br />Ai' .'tj`' �. `T?`„iy4O MER
<br />S ec�aReuen eFLntls:°_ n. t .. w«,� tai u r.�-1.-••.� ':1m ,,,,3�.,.r.,,'Y,. .i"''X:;• :^C' i-
<br />t..,.n'.'.`+:Yc-tv nS;.'Sli. m...t%_"u.'-,,-r^':v'z. .�dllsna �k2�3apk3�&'41Jtu- .�i• -S.,i: r_.0 .3°c Fa'1i :>' 'ta+-{,r'�.3j 1-._, !'N
<br />•,':'+4!�,d.„. S.clu Jam*.'1+.. _)-_.J,..: _.'=::`.j5_<.�..eY�'4'R�l:'.b/: `.v .a:uFi>✓„'
<br />102 ~
<br />; Ndw'Tr6ffi6* Improvement Fees
<br />8,310,717
<br />=6,047,000
<br />6,047,000
<br />(2,263,717)
<br />(27.24)%
<br />103''
<br />Additional Impact Fees
<br />5,562,038
<br />1,176,074
<br />1,776,957
<br />(3,785,081)
<br />(68.05)%
<br />108
<br />Section_ 8/Rental Assistance
<br />2,276,311
<br />2,261,294
<br />2,258,602
<br />(17,709)
<br />(0.78)%
<br />.:109'
<br />Secondary, Road Construction
<br />10,663,242
<br />7,730,11.5
<br />7,698,994
<br />(2,964,248) .:
<br />(27.80)%
<br />112
<br />Special Law Enforcement
<br />- 30,000
<br />-` 30,000
<br />0
<br />(30,000)
<br />(100.00)%
<br />117
<br />Tree Ordinance Fines
<br />150,000
<br />• 50,000
<br />50,000
<br />(100,000)
<br />(66.67)%.
<br />:119:.
<br />Tourist Development Fund
<br />-,- 813,990
<br />.:--_868,200
<br />- - =868,200
<br /><' 54,210
<br />6.66
<br />x120
<br />911 Surcharge. '.. ',.
<br />-832,025
<br />:x922,379
<br />_" 927,589
<br />- 95;564
<br />11,49
<br />-- 123
<br />:IRCLHAP/SHIP
<br />-1,017,493
<br />"1,176,782
<br />1,176,588
<br />159,095
<br />15.64 %
<br />124
<br />Metro Plan Organization
<br />1,898,483
<br />596,322
<br />592,183
<br />(1,306,300)
<br />- (68.81)%
<br />126._.:'Multi-ju'Nsd-fiction
<br />Law Enforcement
<br />:.141,814.
<br />- - .,-. 0
<br />- -0
<br />(141,814) -
<br />(100.00)%
<br />127
<br />Native Uplands Acquisition
<br />105,000
<br />105,000
<br />-105,000
<br />0
<br />0.00%
<br />M.
<br />Beach Restoration.
<br />1,317,367
<br />_.2,858,637
<br />2,859,405
<br />-. _.. 1,542,038
<br />-117.65%
<br />_--: 1,33:
<br />,.FI6rida.Boating Improvement Prog.
<br />567,771
<br />190,100
<br />190,100
<br />(377;671) ,_
<br />_ _ (66.52)%
<br />`;134._-
<br />Library Begue'st Fund _._ . -
<br />.,10,741
<br />-== =- . ;,' 0
<br />:`- 0
<br />(10,741)
<br />(100:00)%
<br />135 _
<br />Disabl6d Ac' ' ss. Programs
<br />20,000
<br />20,000
<br />20,000
<br />0
<br />0.00
<br />1.3.6 -
<br />Intergove�rimental Grants ,
<br />705,966
<br />705,966
<br />909,559
<br />203,593
<br />28.84
<br />137
<br />Traffic Education Program
<br />60,000
<br />__ 38,460
<br />61,350
<br />1,350
<br />2.25
<br />140 -
<br />CourtFacility,Surcharge Fund
<br />370,452
<br />141,185
<br />170,000
<br />(200,452)
<br />(54.11)%
<br />-141 ,
<br />Additional Couit Costs -
<br />115,340
<br />:,-.122,876
<br />122,876
<br />_ 1,536
<br />6.53%
<br />142
<br />Court Technology Fund --
<br />4.52,686
<br />480,725
<br />371,959
<br />`(80,727)
<br />(17.83)%
<br />145
<br />Land Acquisition Series 2006
<br />65,000
<br />65,000
<br />65,000
<br />0
<br />000 6/0
<br />171 -
<br />E. Gifford Stormwater M.S.B.U.
<br />19,940
<br />:' 57
<br />940
<br />(19,000)
<br />(95.29)%
<br />„179:
<br />Oceanside,Streetlighting
<br />- _. 2,467
<br />- _ 21242
<br />:2,28+1
<br />- (186)
<br />` (7.64)%0
<br />179
<br />Oce-anside`86eet Paving
<br />14;000
<br />14,225_
<br />_ -14,474
<br />: 474
<br />3:39
<br />.180
<br />Oslo ParkStreetlighting
<br />40,408
<br />40,408
<br />40,427
<br />-'19
<br />0:05
<br />181 =
<br />Gifford Streetlighting
<br />127,456
<br />- 77,456
<br />77,470
<br />(49,986)
<br />(39.22)%
<br />182
<br />1_aurelwood f etlighting
<br />= 7,463
<br />7,463
<br />8,667
<br />- 1,204
<br />16..13
<br />183
<br />Rockridge Streetlighting
<br />3,627
<br />•3,621
<br />= 3,631
<br />4
<br />0.11 %
<br />
|