|
Proposed Budget Comparison by Fund
<br />Fiscal Year 2015/16 and 2016/17
<br />Fund Number and Description
<br />FY 2015/16
<br />Budget @
<br />3/31/16
<br />FY 2016/17
<br />Department
<br />Requests
<br />FY 2016/17
<br />Proposed Budget
<br />Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />% Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />- - __ - ' -
<br />-�v.yv:,:,grf.x:_ ;• rr.0 ;.r���'�.�:r.^-�•rxs,w_.
<br />-`-'a. �Ki..a.*�'
<br />.-h':�<,:F::'`
<br />m _Fcintls.��w _., , , ��.;.�
<br />- +t"• _ - ,;ar= '. rr `s '-' rtrtiy - :•1e," .,rS::n ea, __
<br />""6' 'Y:: ...'d. i r:F.:" _ G4`::' -.'s #.-F=,`u :"._wE�; 44`8. �,:.::,..`.-,, {•:i-=iir=5=r =
<br />s>' � ..�:r :s�°� .,. ;=;�Y=... .��z' ..,�,r-= :x
<br />_�' ,•zu-.' �- .sa...,.:rka �,', �s S. , a,>,7r= b:
<br />,a,, ,,-;� • L=r!,�. � .;} � -' uY _ �i ..t -•2,fF ., ''n:,.z;,. _ 1 .. 75:._`I -.j; ..7,,r.. "; : ` -'s _ S ' c; Y -.'.'�>,f'" ;'+'
<br />.ti[s'�,.,��,t„>. . 'K�.J�_� =tir'if°.--��':'c..� ,ped .=; x;:. - �tii"'• ,_,r-. z:,1":_'r„-.-_.,..-+:.a'->`-y
<br />•,2��,.h..�.. ,�:., ,ix�. •.<,.r.,lx;_,��.�>�t.-:-: ��:.u->�;;::sr'fi:�z�..,..-,}:T �a,:-.
<br />001
<br />General Fund -
<br />$81,405,203
<br />$84,576,422
<br />$81,182,145
<br />($223,058)
<br />(0.27)%
<br />004
<br />Municipal Service Taxing Unit Fund
<br />26,699,660
<br />28,175,559
<br />30,395,064
<br />3,695,404
<br />13.84 %
<br />111
<br />Transportation Fund
<br />14,446,303
<br />16,712,195
<br />14,944,450
<br />498,147
<br />345 %
<br />114
<br />Emergency Services District
<br />36,671,961
<br />36,281,132
<br />34,331,941'
<br />(2,340,020)
<br />(638)%
<br />245
<br />2004 Land,Acquisition Bonds
<br />4,537,636
<br />4,553,093
<br />4,545,134
<br />7,498
<br />017 %
<br />=
<br />T6tal_-Ad Valorem Taxing Funds:
<br />$1631760,763
<br />$170,298,401
<br />$165,398,734
<br />$1,637,971
<br />1.00
<br />irk. w' {Y Y..'2eR '- -'IL.r`. ^a'�2Jmt:. t"L ...tFnr •.)a '�}-v-, �3=YK;'F._• i't-' 9'-�is'SSi
<br />���: f Jy ,�" .r. .X�u <r ,:�'i^'.iv'k:, •-5... ,if..` 'i-,... _ .;{ . {'u.' „cx-1e 't-0.',�9."='�'-i•r ��= - '_'C�ri Si`fti: ,.5, ..
<br />-�F.S"d.. ;. J. ,i.:.;'f":!. „t,..:ay,i,:t.,T 5, f, :k%?• :, .+F^i.<.Y__ ^`; ✓ ':E!r t'i-t s`f.s. .lL^' 'a+" :,fAJ..-r,•i;{:.�, J.p.;
<br />r :: ,ir�.q_y.` -�yK;.�.�1 �r.a�r. 1. t;rm1 L",p, y.t,f`'': .1i"'`r.,. - �:�:4a,t.--
<br />4 , � , .:y. ''y' � �"� ,W r�,''i' � \ w,.:-,• s .a!�;a.`�._..
<br />FIN.
<br />•.Sd6tl.,Waste:D�s osal.Drstricf�'_,��.:,,���;�.,��m�Y��u,-;�`��..�., ,,�, { �..���` ���r�, r, �w��.�.. 3�:�-��
<br />., .. K-_._ _. .__.. �tft�._ .� ,...T... ��... .i.F:.-w.:3`n_•i '� F! ° "� -$x _"..I�ri '2`�_ .,..�Ff3vc{.-,a_S'�f:1`.��h �. i'%",�.�i"�',"� +F,r._h:: "E
<br />;4,11 >_
<br />Solid Waste Disposal District
<br />$13,137,435
<br />$13,144,778
<br />$13,141,095
<br />$3,660
<br />0.03 %
<br />_ '+J.Y,.fi _ __ ?1r S,tf:' -s: 1'=,r: t•Gt./� ✓'!Y. -+f -•...,y -..y- - - �-r5:. .t'.Ci'�1-:Cu Yt•Gyti\-J';
<br />:=K�''•I`5 '� �;•v'1`e:S'1.. :': is-" - _a5.�'i"2•;'cG' i`:h,. �,fr.,. .±N ..ui-•.
<br />-Ff. �,2,..'!,•i.-l..t%L. w.,,..ry,',�'wr-.. 5 �� , Y �r {- :�Sta �n_ .�2i`11-'=-'��:r`„r .?:e+'
<br />%SF�,..2 S7V ,J. .31 �it.;t'iF.-f ; ,.4
<br />g--aAN rFL r. cM T,y .Cr�:t^. .la �" u. r ,\'�.,+�^- 1 y%�=s•�1,,.,i,1, .11'Y} ��.. i', AJ`-� '7' =
<br />.S eaa%Revenue. Funols:�,- ^k. .�::� .:{C)'1-13Z/N+�`,a< i?..i�Nc.,�S.mii�n5`is.t,`�7�'iic rol^F.l'nU�11_.iF'!.',-., .�J� -i:]`1 +�;Ir�t.'il=�:�' :i:J;l:�'jSiiJii__.._•S.T!{j_:'r:~.i�irJ„f.�
<br />,y
<br />102-
<br />New Traffic Improvement Fees
<br />8,310,717
<br />6,047,000
<br />6,047,000
<br />(2,263,717)
<br />(27.24)%
<br />103 -
<br />Additional Impact Fees
<br />5,562,038
<br />1,776,074
<br />1,776,957
<br />(3,785,081)
<br />(68.05)%
<br />108
<br />Section 8/Rental Assistance
<br />2,276,311
<br />2,261,294
<br />2,258,602
<br />(17,709)
<br />(0.78)%
<br />109
<br />Secondary. -Road Construction
<br />10,663,242
<br />7,730,11,5
<br />7,698,994
<br />(2,964,248)
<br />(27.80)%
<br />112
<br />Special Law Enforcement
<br />30,000
<br />30,000
<br />- 0
<br />(30,000)
<br />(10000)%
<br />117
<br />Tree Ordinance Fines
<br />150,000
<br />50,000
<br />50,000
<br />(100,000)
<br />(66.67)%
<br />-119
<br />Tourist Development Fund
<br />813,990
<br />868,200
<br />- -868,200
<br />54,210
<br />.6.66%
<br />-120 -
<br />911 Surcharge
<br />832,025
<br />922,379
<br />927,589
<br />95,564
<br />11,49 %
<br />- 123
<br />IRCLHAP/SHIP
<br />1,017,493
<br />1,176,782
<br />1,176,588
<br />159,095
<br />15.64%
<br />124
<br />Metro Plan Organization
<br />1,898,483
<br />596,322
<br />592,183
<br />(1,306,300)
<br />(68.81)0/.
<br />126
<br />Multi -jurisdiction Law Enforcement
<br />141,814
<br />-- 0
<br />0
<br />(141,814) -
<br />(100.00)%
<br />127
<br />Native Uplands Acquisition
<br />105,000
<br />105,000
<br />105,000
<br />- 0
<br />000%
<br />-128
<br />Beach Restoration -
<br />1,317,367
<br />2,858,637
<br />2,859,405
<br />1,542,038
<br />117 05 %
<br />133
<br />Florida Boating Improvement Prog.
<br />567,771
<br />190,100
<br />190,100
<br />(377,671)
<br />(6652)%
<br />134
<br />Library Bequest Fund _
<br />10,741 -
<br />-- - 0
<br />0
<br />(10,741)
<br />(10000)%
<br />135
<br />Disabled Access Programs
<br />20,000
<br />20,000
<br />20,000
<br />0
<br />0.00 %
<br />136
<br />Intergovernmental Grants
<br />705,966
<br />705,966
<br />909,559
<br />203,593
<br />28.84 %
<br />137
<br />Traffic Education Program
<br />60,000
<br />38,460
<br />61,350
<br />1,350
<br />2.25 °%
<br />140
<br />Court Facility -Surcharge Fund
<br />370,452
<br />141,185
<br />170,000
<br />(200,452)
<br />(5411)%
<br />141
<br />Additional Court Costs
<br />115,340
<br />122,876
<br />122,876
<br />7,536
<br />6.53 %
<br />142
<br />Court Technology Fund
<br />452,686
<br />480,725
<br />371,959
<br />(80,727)
<br />(1783)%
<br />145
<br />Land Acquisition Series 2006
<br />65,000
<br />65,000
<br />65,000
<br />0
<br />000 %
<br />171
<br />E. Gifford Stormwater M.S.B U
<br />19,940
<br />57
<br />940
<br />(19,000)
<br />(95.29)%
<br />179
<br />Oceanside Streetlighting
<br />- 2,467
<br />- -2,242
<br />2,281
<br />(186)
<br />(754)%
<br />179
<br />Oceanside Street Paving
<br />14,000
<br />14,225
<br />14,474
<br />474
<br />3.39 %
<br />180
<br />Oslo Park Streetlighting
<br />40,408
<br />40,408
<br />40,427
<br />19
<br />0.05 %
<br />181
<br />Gifford Streetlighting
<br />127,456
<br />-77,456
<br />77,470
<br />(49,986)
<br />(39.22)%
<br />182
<br />Laurelwood Streetlighting
<br />7,463
<br />- 7,463
<br />8,667
<br />1,204
<br />1613%
<br />183
<br />Rockridge Streetlighting
<br />3,627 1
<br />3,627 1
<br />3,631 1
<br />4 1
<br />0.11 %
<br />1.6-5
<br />
|