Laserfiche WebLink
NJ N1 LGi FI `1u',�.9 <br />a 3)2 <br />December 18, 1991 <br />Robert W. Schlitt <br />505 66th Avenue <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32968 <br />BOOK 8 7 P;,uL 62 <br />RE: Appeal Regarding Status of ±5 Acre Parcel [Tax ID#18-33-39- <br />00001-0080-00005.1]: Board of.County Commissioners' Decision <br />Dear Mr. Schlitt: <br />At its regular meeting of December 17, 1991 the Board of County <br />Commissioners considered the above referenced appeal. Although the <br />Board did not grant the appeal pursuant to the provisions of <br />section 902 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the Board <br />did determine (4-1) that the subject property and its recent zoning <br />'history is unique and that the county is equitably estopped from <br />applying any zoning standards more stringent than the RS -1 district <br />requirements. Therefore, staff is now applying only the RS -1 <br />zoning district standards to the subject parcel. <br />The result of the Board's action is that the previously submitted <br />Michael Schlitt building permit application (reference project <br />#91090106) can be taken off hold by county planning staff as soon <br />as he provides staff a copy of the recorded deed establishing the <br />second +21 acre parcel. As you are aware, a separate parcel must <br />be created for the proposed Michael Schlitt residence. As <br />previously explained to you and Michael Schlitt, and :as I mentioned <br />_ to Michael after the December 17th Board meeting, the subject ±5 <br />acre parcel may be split one time into two separate, buildable <br />Li '`j -parcels without platting.' Any subsequent property division may <br />`>= only occur via the filing of a plat. <br />=x *--Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not <br />�_-hesitate to contact me at (407) 567-8000, extension 242. I await <br />--- - . <br />documentation from Michael regarding creation of the second, ±21 <br />:= = acre parcel. <br />Sincerely, <br />Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />Mr. Schlitt stated he had an application before Planning & <br />Zoning to plat the one remaining lot. Mr. Schlitt outlined the <br />history of his appearances before the Planning & Zoning Commission <br />as well as the Board of County Commissioners and the decision of <br />the Board on December 17, 1991. He felt he was not being treated <br />fairly in this instance and asked where the votes on this item <br />would come from since there were only three Commissioners sitting <br />at this meeting. <br />Attorney Collins advised that the public hearing was <br />advertised and the Board can act. If the vote were not unanimous, <br />the Board could table the decision on this specific parcel to a <br />time certain when four Board members are present. <br />18 <br />