Laserfiche WebLink
VOCELLE & BERG, LLP <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP OF <br />3333 20TH STREET <br />ST. LUCIE COUNTY OFFICE <br />PROFESSIONAL AuocunoNs: <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-2469 <br />101 NORTH U.S. ONE, SUITE ao <br />Pr. PiERcE,FLORIDA 3495o <br />LOUIS B. VOCHLLH, iR., P.A. <br />TELEPHONE 7 72) 562-8111 <br />{ <br />TELErHONE:(nz)459-0774 <br />BOARD CER7IFIEO CIVILTRIAL LAWYER <br />BOARD CEItTIPIED BUswm LITIGATION <br />FAX (772) 562-2870 <br />HAROLD G. MELVILLE - OF COUNSEL <br />Internet Vvww.VocelIeBerg.com <br />BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER <br />PAUL R. BERG, P.A. <br />BOARD CERTIFIED BUSINESS LITIGATION <br />BOARD CERTIFIED CMLTIUAL LAWYER <br />BOARD CnnFIED BRISINESs LtncAnoN <br />PLEASE <br />ALEXANDRA M. MCGEE <br />REPLY To V ERO BEACH <br />ALSO ADMITTED IN PENNSYLVANIA & NEW JERSEY <br />E-MAIL: <br />BVocefle@VocelleBerg.com <br />YTure@Voce eBerg.com (FL Registered Paralegal) <br />October 11, 2016 <br />Sent via Email only: e-service@ircgov.com; <br />Dylan Reingold, Esquire <br />Indian River County Attorney <br />1801276' Street <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />Re: Blair & Scott adv. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement <br />Case No.: 31 -2012 -CA -000937 <br />Our File No.: 5972.00001 <br />Dear Mr. Reingold: <br />As you know, I have the pleasure of representing the Defendants, Kim Blair, Carol Scott and <br />Jay Scott in consolidated Cases Number: 31 -2012 -CA -000937. This letter is to confirm our <br />settlement with all parties including the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement and Indian <br />River County. As a part of said settlement the County agrees to Quit Claim the land in question to <br />the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement. <br />Please be advised that all of the Defendants fully support this conveyance from the County to <br />the State in light of the very favorable settlement that the Defendants once the Quit Claim Deed has <br />been executed and recorded. <br />I realize that the Defendants were initially in opposition to the State claiming any ownership <br />in the land. In fact, I appeared before the County Commission to argue that the County owned the <br />land and that the County should not defer to the State. That position was taken when my clients were <br />completely at odds with the State well before the mediation conference on September 14, 2016. Now <br />that my clients have reached a favorable settlement with the State, they fully support the conveyance <br />of the subject property from the County to the State to effectuate the terms of the agreed upon <br />settlement. <br />63 <br />