Laserfiche WebLink
CONSENT AGENDA <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY�� <br />OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET <br />PURCHASING DIVISION <br />DATE: <br />September 27, 2016 <br />TO: <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THROUGH: <br />Jason E. Brown, County Administrator <br />Mike Smykowski, Director, Office of Management and Budget <br />FROM: <br />Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Managgr_) <br />SUBJECT: <br />Recommended Ranking of Consultants — RFQ 2016016 — 58th Avenue Pavement <br />Reclamation and Resurfacing Project — 57th Street to CR -510 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On behalf of the Public Works Department and in accordance with FS 287.055, Requests for <br />Qualifications (RFQs) were solicited for professional engineering services for the design of the 58th <br />Avenue Project. The improvements to 58th Avenue will include rehabilitation of the existing pavement <br />using full depth reclamation process, construction of five-foot paved shoulders, addition of left turn <br />lanes on all approaches to the intersection of 69th Street, new traffic signal at 69th Street, replacement <br />of the signal at CR -510, culvert extensions and replacement, and the placement of hot mix (Superpave) <br />asphalt. The total project length is approximately 3 Y2 miles. <br />RFQ RESULTS: <br />Advertising Date: <br />RFQ Opening Date: <br />DemandStar Broadcast to: <br />RFQ Documents Requested by <br />Replies: <br />July 6, 2016 <br />July 29, 2016 at 2:00 pm <br />420 Subscribers <br />32 Firms <br />4 Firms <br />ANALYSIS: <br />A selection committee comprised of Richard Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director, James Ennis, P.E., <br />PMP, County Engineer, Kim Graham, P.E., Traffic Engineer, Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects <br />Manager and David Hays, P.E., Land Development Manager independently evaluated and scored the <br />statements of qualifications in accordance with FS 287.055 and the County Purchasing Manual. These <br />scores were compiled by the committee and an overall ranking of the submittals developed. The top <br />three ranked firms were invited to participate in discussions. After the interviews, the committee <br />members again independently ranked the firms and a committee ranking was compiled. <br />86 <br />