My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/28/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
7/28/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:09:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 2r ' <br />BOOK <br />building permit within 30 days and start work on the structure <br />within a 60 -day period. <br />Commissioner Scurlock suggested that because of liability, we <br />make a stipulation that no one live there during those 60 days, and <br />everyone indicated their agreement. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously <br />granted a 60 -day period to allow the Robinson's <br />enough time to submit plans to the Building Dept., <br />obtain a building permit, and proceed with the work <br />within 60 days, with the stipulation that no one <br />will live in the structure during that time. <br />II. 12950 101st Lane - Estate of Sadie Gunder <br />II. 12950 101st LANE: <br />Parcel Number: 00-31-37-00002-0000-00035.0 <br />Owner: Estate of Sadie Gunder <br />Three structures <br />.. <br />A. Environmental Health Department Action <br />B. Code Enforcement Division Action <br />C. Inspection by Building Department <br />D. Certified Notice to Estate of Owner <br />E. Posted property with Condemnation Card <br />F. Photographs of property on file <br />G. 1990 and 1991 Tax Certificates Sold <br />H. Notice to Estate of July 28th meeting by Certified mail, <br />postage prepaid, return receipt requested <br />Director Rymer explained that this was brought to us by the <br />Code Enforcement Board. The notices were received by a relative, <br />Mrs. Sadie Brooks. <br />Attorney Vitunac asked if there had been notification of this <br />in the newspaper, and.Director Rymer stated that it had not been <br />placed in the newspaper. <br />William Clayton, grandson of the deceased, advised that the <br />structure had been donated to the Fire Department who burned the <br />home down for fire fighting practice. <br />Director Rymer explained that staff was out there on July 25, <br />1992 and the structure was still standing. The Fire Department <br />should have notified the County Building Dept. of the burning. <br />Chairman Eggert felt this is a misunderstanding. It isn't the <br />property that is in question, it is the structure, which apparently <br />has been burned down intentionally by the Fire Department. <br />64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.