7/28/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUL 2 8 N92 BOOK land development regulations in order to maximize open space and conserve natural features, incorporate recreational facilities, and mixed use projects." This invocation of the planned development policies and regulations was not addressed at the earlier Board meeting specifically in relation to Future Land Use Policy 5.4. However, Mr. O'Haire's contention that the permit conflicts with Future Land Use Policy 1.5 which provides that "No residential development in C-2 or C-3 areas shall occur unless such development is approved as a planned development" was addressed in the Staff Report. Mr. O'Haire's appeal letters also raised the planned development issue. At the June 2nd meeting this contention was rejected by the Board.) CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: In the absence of any new facts or evidence to be considered by the Board, the County Commission should not void the wetland resource permit previously issued to Mr. Krovocheck on which administrative appeals have been heard. The County's exposure to damages for violations of due process and equal protection would be greater should they void the permit in the absence of any facts, evidence or testimony to rebut the findings and recommendations of their professional staff and the -prior testimony of Mr. Krovocheck's professional engineer at the appeal hearing. I recommend that the County Attorney be authorized to respond to Mr. O'Haire that the County Commission has considered his Verified Complaint and chosen not to void the wetland resource permit of Mr. Krovocheck. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously declined Mr. O'Haire's request to void the wetland resource permit of Mr. Krovocheck, as recommended by Attorney Collins. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS IN SEPTEMBER After discussing vacation times, the Board scheduled the following public hearing dates: Preliminary Budget Hearing: Sept. 9, 1992 at 5:01 p.m. Final Budget Hearing: Sept. 15, 1992 at 5:01 p.m. First Meeting - LDR's: September 3, 1992 at 5:01 p.m. Final Meeting - LDR's: September 17, 1992 at 5:01 p.m. Attorney Vitunac advised that to take any action at any of these meetings, a majority vote of 3-1 would be needed. If only three members of the Board are present, the Motion would have to be unanimous. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Chairman Eggert announced that immediately upon adjournment the Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately.