My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/11/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
8/11/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/11/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, as the principal design <br />professional, and has attached that agreement to this agenda item. <br />The agreement covers all necessary services needed for the <br />replacement of this bridge, such as producing construction plans, <br />approach modifications and permitting. The fee will be a lump sum <br />fee of $66,900.00, with certain contingencies to be paid in <br />addition to the $66,900.00. These contingencies would include the <br />utility accommodation charge billed on a hourly basis as set out in <br />the agreement, and this fee would be paid by any utility which <br />chooses to put its facilities on the bridge. Currently the City of <br />Vero Beach has water and sewer on the existing bridge. <br />In addition, the county would like to have the engineer prepare a <br />maintenance of traffic plan for keeping the bridge open to traffic <br />during construction. This alternative would be chosen based upon <br />the increase in the construction cost of the bridge when the bids <br />are received and tabulated with the maintenance of traffic on the <br />bridge as an alternate bid. Upon presenting the bids to the Board <br />at the time of evaluation, the staff could recommend to the Board <br />which alternate seems most favorable and the Board could decide <br />based upon the increase in costs for keeping the bridge open, <br />versus closing the bridge for the time of construction. The <br />engineer has stated that it could prepare plans for the maintenance <br />of traffic and a suitable construction plan for a fee of $4,500.00 <br />additional. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Alternative No. 1 - Approve the Professional Services Agreement <br />With Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc./Carter Associates, and <br />approve the additional $4,500.00 for the study for the Maintenance <br />of Traffic Plan in order to maintain traffic during the <br />construction phases of the project, and authorize the Chairman to <br />execute the agreement on behalf of the Board. <br />Alternative No. 2 - Not approve the agreement. Direct staff to re- <br />negotiate the contract, or direct staff to begin negotiations with <br />the second ranked firm. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends Plternate No. 1 with funding from Account No. 111- <br />214-541-066.31 and also additional funding from Impact Fee Funds, <br />the project being located in Districts 5 & S. <br />Director Davis clarified that this will be a 5 -lane bridge <br />which will accommodate the traffic needs of that area for at least <br />20 years. Construction will be within Indian River Farms Water <br />Control District right-of-way north of the bridge. South of the <br />bridge there is a gas station on the west side and a fast food <br />restaurant on the east side, and we will need to acquire some <br />right-of-way along the frontage of those two businesses. <br />27 <br />AUG J1 N92 " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.