My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/10/2017 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
01/10/2017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2017 3:48:32 PM
Creation date
2/21/2017 1:38:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/10/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IRCUD Well S-4 Technical Memorandum <br />December 9, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />JLA Geosciences, Inc. <br />Selected photographs comparing features from the 2016 and 2009 well videos are included as Attachment <br />A. Geophysical logging performed by AWE included caliper, dual induction, gamma ray, and static and <br />dynamic fluid conductivity and flow Togs. PDF Copies of the geophysical logs are included as Attachment <br />B. <br />Due to existing concerns over the S4 casing damage, JLA reviewed the 2002 and 2005 CDM IRCWUD South <br />Wellfield Rehabilitation Phase I &II Reports which outlined how the well S4 casing was originally damaged. <br />Key points from the Phase I & 11 Reports are summarized below: <br />• As described in the Phase I Report (2002) the well 54 pump and column pipe (45 feet length) had <br />become come stuck in the well and required the use of a vibratory hammer and 100 ton crane for <br />removal. During the pump removal process the S4 PVC well casing was separated at 26 feet below <br />pad level (BPL) and was raised up approximately 3-4 inches above the concrete pump pedestal as <br />a result of this effort. <br />• As described in the Phase II Report (2005) repairs were made to the S4 wellhead but not to the <br />cracked well casing. At the time the cracked well casing was not considered a sanitary hazard <br />because the 24 inch diameter steel surface casing provided a sanitary seal between shallow <br />groundwater and the S4 production interval. <br />• Phase II Report (2005) also mentions a plumbness and alignment test (P&A) was performed to <br />determine if the new pump and column pipe would pass freely to the new pump setting depth of <br />100 feet BPL. The P&A test descriptions stated there were two locations where the well was not <br />properly aligned and that the pump column pipe became lodged, but "not too tightly" during <br />installation. <br />SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the work completed to date, the following conclusion and recommendations are being <br />presented for IRCWUD UFA Well S4: <br />• Historically, well pump assemblies have been difficult to extract from well S4 due to an out of <br />plumb PVC well casing. <br />• Pump removal efforts to date have caused visible damage to the S4 PVC well casing at depths <br />between 7 feet and 46 feet BPL. <br />• Damage to the S4 well casing has been present since the pump was removed using a vibratory <br />hammer and crane as reporting in the Phase I report (2002). <br />• Observations from the 2009 and 2016 well videos shows growth on the S4 PVC well casing has <br />increased. <br />jlageosciences.com <br />P108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.