8/18/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Scurlock asked whether the Board could approve the assessment roll, with the exception of the Earman property and, sitting as the Equalizing Board, make a determination at a later time. Attorney Vitunac advised that the Board could approve the assessment roll subject to having a hearing on September 1. In the meantime, if Mr. Earman changes his mind tomorrow, then it is done. Commissioner Bird preferred to wait two weeks for approval on the assessment roll because he wanted to think about Mr. Gallagher's request also. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, to delay approval of the assessment roll until the September 1, 1992 Regular Meeting to give Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Earman time to react to some of the items that were brought up today and to consider their options, and the Board would address those matters at that time. Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock felt, and Chairman Eggert agreed that the only decision to be made is whether there is unusable property, either because of a deed restriction or other decision, in which case they would get a reduction in their assessment. Director Pinto pointed out that the only consequence would be that their assessment might be decreased, in which case we would have to increase everyone else's assessments. It is merely a distribution of the total cost. Commissioner Bird requested that staff recalculate the cost, excluding the properties on the north side of 10th Street, and report those figures at the September 1 meeting. -- Director Pinto pointed out that it would be a matter of deleting $18,000 plus $11,000 from a total project of $126,000. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF THE REVISED GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE OVERALL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (OEDP) The Board reviewed memo from Long -Range Planning Chief Sasan Rohani dated August 11, 1992: 39 AUG . �' BOOK dJ FADEw