My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/25/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
8/25/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/25/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />H. Request for a Ouit-Claim Deed to Clear Title <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/19/92: <br />TO: The Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: k1e— William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney <br />DATE: August 19, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: Request for a Quit -Claim Deed to Clear Title - Indian River <br />Title/ Carlisle <br />Mr. and Mrs. Carlisle have acquired property in the Rosepark Subdivision <br />north of 16th Street. In reviewing title on the property in question, Indian <br />River Title Corporation has determined that a 1983 deed conveyed five feet <br />of right-of-way on the south portion of the property to Indian River County <br />for right-of-way. <br />The 1983 deed described the property as "the North 5 feet of the South 15 <br />feet of Lot 6 and the West 29.73 feet of Lot 5, Block 2, Rosepark <br />Subdivision, ...". <br />The description should have read "the North 5 feet of the South 15 feet of <br />Lot 6 and the North 5 of the South 15 feet of the West 29.73 feet of Lot 5, <br />Block 2, Rosepark Subdivision, ...". <br />In essence, the entire West 29.73 feet of Lot 5, Block 2, on which is located <br />a portion of a concrete stucco dwelling and driveway as well as a portion of <br />the yard for the dwelling, was conveyed to Indian River County. <br />As a requirement for title insurance and mortgage financing, that the <br />ambiguous deed must be corrected. I have spoken with representatives ::of <br />Indian River Title Corporation and agree that a quit -claim deed to those <br />portions of the lot on which the dwelling, yard and driveway are located, <br />outside of the desired right-of-way, should be reconveyed by quit -claim <br />deed. <br />The original deed to the County, a survey of the property, and a Quit -Claim <br />Deed are attached. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Authorize the Chairman to execute the Quit -Claim Deed from Indian River <br />County to Rodney Carlisle and Sue Carlisle, his wife, to remove the <br />ambiguity in title created by the 1983 deed, <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously <br />authorized the Chairman to execute the Quit - <br />Claim Deed from Indian River County to Rodney <br />Carlisle and Sue Carlisle, has wife, to remove <br />the ambiguity in title created by the 1983 <br />deed, as recommended by staff. <br />A COPY OF THE QUIT -CLAIM DEED IS ON FILE IN <br />THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD - <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.