My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/17/2017 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
01/17/2017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2017 1:44:52 PM
Creation date
4/13/2017 12:07:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/07/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Defunding HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule - Speeches - United States... Page 3 of5 <br />Under the new rule, HUD doesn't replace local Pudic Housing Authorities - it conscripts them into its service. <br />Mr. President, this gets to the heart of the difference between my amendment and the amendment offered by <br />my colleague, Senator Collins. <br />The danger of AFFH is not that HUD will direct local governments and public housing authorities to make <br />specific changes to their zoning policies. It will just threaten them, by tying obedience to federal Community <br />Development Block Grants. <br />CDBG is a federal -grant program controlled by HUD that allocates $3 billion per year to local governments to <br />help them address avariety of community-developrnent needs, including providing adequate and affordable <br />public housing. <br />Traditionally, local officials have been free to use their CDBG grant money according to their community's <br />needs and priorities. But underAFFH,,HUD officials will withhold a local government's CDBG funds unless that <br />local government adopts HUD's preferred housing policies. <br />Predictably, proponents of the rule claim that this will be a collaborative process, with local -government <br />officials in the driver's seat while the bureaucrats at HUD merely provide "support" and "guidance." But the 10 - <br />month track record of AFFli suggests that the opposite will be true <br />In fact, I have already heard from the Housing Authority of Salt Lake County predicting that the costs of <br />complying with AFFH will stretch their already -thin resources, add hundreds of hours of bureaucratic <br />paperwork to their workloads, and -eliminate their autonomy to determine the best ways to provide adequate <br />low-cost housing to their community. <br />Mr. President, the problem with HUD's new rule has noth ng to do. with the intentions behind it <br />In a press release announcing the finalization of AFFH, HUD Secretary Julian Castro said: "Unfortunately, too <br />many Americans find their drearns limited by Where they come from, and a ZIP code should never determine a <br />child's future " <br />I completely agree. <br />There's no disputing that the neighborhood in which a chid grows up affects his educational, social,'and <br />professional outcomes in the future. Nor is there any disagreement that far too many children today are raised <br />in dysfunctional neighborhoods because it's the only place their parents can find affordable housing. <br />The lack of affordable housing is not a new problem in America - just ask anyone who has ever had to pay rent <br />in one the major metropolitan areas controlled by the Democratic Party But neither is the solution. <br />/92-ZG <br />hitn•//www lee senntc> l)=7I)l69(4R-Af171)-41R(1_RS41-)- 1')/1'2/')(11(, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.