My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/21/2017
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
02/21/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 1:02:48 PM
Creation date
4/13/2017 12:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/21/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
file an annual report for 2017 and will not be in compliance with tax abatement requirements for <br />2017. <br />Under requirements of the tax exemption agreement and the County's Chapter 1100 tax exemption <br />regulations (see attachment 4), INEOS is required to provide a number of new jobs at a high average <br />wage level, file an annual report on or before January 15' of each year beginning in 2013, abide by <br />representations made to the Board, and comply with tax exemption requirements. The annual report <br />filing provides the County with a timely and convenient opportunity to verify compliance with tax <br />exemption requirements prior to the March 1 annual filing deadline for an economic development tax <br />exemption. If at any time the Board determines that INEOS is not in compliance, the Board may <br />revoke, revise, or suspend the tax exemption. <br />While INEOS does not intend to comply with the tax abatement requirements for the 2017 tax year <br />and has not provided an annual report for 2017, INEOS has provided quarterly 2016 employment <br />reports to County staff. Staff reviewed those reports and verified INEOS's compliance with tax <br />abatement requirements for this past tax year (2016), including representations made in its tax <br />abatement application. At this time, staff is bringing data to the Board to document INEOS' <br />compliance with tax abatement requirements for this past year (2016). Staff is also informing the <br />Board that INEOS will not qualify for the tax abatement exemption for 2017 and is seeking Board <br />action to suspend the abatement exemption for 2017. By suspending the exemption, the Board may <br />keep open the possibility of transferring any remaining years of the plant facility's 10 year tax <br />abatement to a future prospective purchaser/operator of the facility if they meet the original tax <br />abatement requirements. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Consistent with the tax abatement ordinance (see attachment 2), INEOS was approved to receive a <br />ten year tax abatement of its ad valorem taxes for the General Fund, Municipal Services Taxing Units, <br />and the Emergency Services District. That abatement was approved at 100% for years one through <br />three, with a 10% yearly decline each year starting with year four at 90% abatement and ending with <br />year ten at 30% abatement. If INEOS had continued its operations in compliance with the agreement, <br />it would currently be in year five of the tax abatement schedule and would be eligible for 80% <br />abatement for year 2017. <br />Over the last several years, INEOS obtained approval of economic development incentives, <br />developed a bioenergy production facility at the southwest corner of Oslo Road/74th Avenue (former <br />Ocean Spray site), and hired facility personnel. Employees were first hired starting in late 2011, even <br />before the plant was fully completed. By the end of 2012, INEOS had 56 employees. The number <br />increased in 2013 and in 2014, rising to 64 employees in late 2013 and 68 employees in late 2014. In <br />December of 2015, INEOS reported employment levels in the mid -50s. For 2016, employment levels <br />had fallen to an average of 50 employees for the entire year (over 50 employees were on payroll for <br />the first 10 months, with 41 employees for the 11th month and 29 employees for the 12' month). As <br />shown in the table below, average wages per employee for the year 2016 were $84,520.69. The <br />average annual wage calculation includes employees that worked only part of a quarter. In fact, <br />excluding wages of those employees would increase the average annual wage. The 2016 average <br />annual wage exceeds all previous year annual wages (see attachment #5). <br />C•\Users\GRANIC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Teclmologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@18051225\@BCL@18051225.docx 2 <br />P35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.