Laserfiche WebLink
"(0 <br />O <br />O <br />'8/05/91(legal)RESO/Vk <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91- 65 <br />A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, <br />FLORIDA, IN OPPOSITION TO THE NATIONAL <br />VOTER REGISTRATION ACT, SENATE BILL 250 <br />AND IN SUPPORT OF SENATE BILL 921. <br />WHEREAS, Senate Bill 250, the National Voter Registration Act, may be <br />considered by the full Senate in June, 1991; and <br />WHEREAS, this Act would require counties, among other governments, <br />to implement and absorb much of the substantial costs of a new <br />federally mandated voter registration program; and <br />WHEREAS, the Bill would mandate Indian River County to require voter <br />registration in connection with drivers' license applications and renewals, <br />mail -in registration, agency registration in state and local government <br />offices, such as schools, libraries, government revenue offices, public <br />assistance offices, unemployment offices, etc., and would impose procedures <br />and standards regarding maintenance and confirmation of voter rolls; and <br />WHEREAS, Senate Bill 250 gives no consideration to whether Indian <br />River County is doing a good job presently in registering people to vote or <br />whether the County has the resources to fund these new requirements; and <br />WHEREAS, Senate Bill 250 may create an environment for increased <br />voter fraud; and <br />WHEREAS, Senate Bill 921, an alternate, is acceptable since it is <br />voluntary and funds part of the costs, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: <br />1. Indian River County is opposed to adoption of Senate Bill 250, since the <br />Bill is an unwarranted, unnecessary, and expensive infringement upon <br />the rights of state and county governments, and since the adoption of <br />the Bill would increase voter registration fraud. <br />2. Copies of this resolution be provided to Senator Bob Graham and <br />Senator Connie Mack. <br />The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheel er , <br />and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being <br />put to a vote, the vote was as follows: <br />