Laserfiche WebLink
Table 14: Transit versus Aute Travel Time Level of Service <br />From <br />To <br />Transit <br />min <br />Auto <br />min <br />Difference <br />min <br />LOS <br />Sebastian Highlands <br />Sebastian Wal-Mart <br />21 <br />10 <br />11 <br />B <br />Sebastian Wal-Mart <br />Sebastian Highlands <br />21 <br />7 <br />14 <br />B <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />Miracle Mile <br />20 <br />7 <br />13 <br />B <br />Miracle Mile <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />22 <br />5 <br />17 <br />C <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />Gifford <br />43 <br />10 <br />33 <br />D <br />Gifford <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />37 <br />8 <br />29 <br />C <br />Miracle Mile <br />Gifford <br />45 <br />10 <br />35 <br />D <br />Gifford <br />Miracle Mile <br />37 <br />10 <br />27 <br />C <br />Indian River Mall <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />17, <br />11 <br />6 <br />B <br />Original Town Vero Beach <br />Indian River Mall <br />17 <br />9 <br />8 <br />B <br />Miracle Mile <br />Indian River Medical Center <br />30 <br />6 <br />24 <br />C <br />Indian River Medical Center <br />Miracle Mile <br />22 <br />6 <br />16 <br />C <br />Indian River Mall <br />SR 60 West <br />22 <br />11 <br />11 <br />B <br />SR 60 West <br />Indian River Mall <br />30 <br />11 <br />19 <br />C <br />Indian River Medical Center <br />Downtown Vero Beach <br />22 <br />6 <br />16 <br />C <br />Downtown Vero Beach <br />Indian River Medical Center <br />28 <br />6 <br />22 <br />C <br />The results of the analysis show that the GoLine performed well in the measures of average <br />loading, reliability, and transit vs. auto travel time. The system did not perform well, from a <br />TQOS perspective, in the measures of frequency, hours of service, and service coverage. <br />FDOT is aware that transit agencies have limited resources to provide and enhance service. <br />However, in the same manner that roads performing at LOS F receive higher priority for <br />improvements, those areas that perform poorly in transit will also receive future priority for <br />improvement. Table 15 below shows the number of measures recorded for each LOS for the 16 <br />activity center pair combinations. Table 16 shows the summary results from the template <br />spreadsheet. <br />Table 15: Measures Recorded for TOOS usina Activitv Center Pairs <br />LOS <br />Frequency <br />Hours of <br />Service <br />Average <br />Loading <br />Reliability <br />Transit vs Auto <br />Travel Time <br />A <br />0 <br />0 <br />14 <br />16 <br />0 <br />B <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />6 <br />C <br />0 <br />0 <br />2 <br />0 <br />8 <br />D <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />2 <br />E <br />14 <br />16 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />F <br />2 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Title VI Program (2017 Update) <br />Page 38 <br />P147 <br />