My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/04/2017 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
04/04/2017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 1:21:11 PM
Creation date
5/22/2017 10:45:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/04/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development <br />Community Planning and Development <br />3. Activities eligible and meet a national objective <br />(i) Do all activities meet a National Objective? <br />Yes[ No ❑ if no, explain: <br />(ii) Is there evidence that 100 percent of the grant amount principally benefitted persons of low, <br />moderate and middle income (individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of <br />AMI)? <br />Yes Z Non <br />(iii) Did grantee use more than 10 percent of its NSP21NSP3 grant for demolition activities? <br />Yes[] No ❑ N/A Z if yes, date(s) of wavier - <br />(iv) Are all NSP -assisted homes occupied by income -eligible residents? <br />YesGZ No ❑ if no, explain: <br />(v) Did all NSP -assisted rental units meet the "affordable rents" standards? <br />Yes❑ No ❑ N/A ® if no, explain: <br />(vi) Do all NSP assisted units have appropriate mechanisms in place to ensure compliance with the <br />required minimum affordability period? <br />YesV No ❑ <br />(vii) Do all rental projects meet the NSP proportional requirements of units occupied by income -eligible <br />households or the CDBG criteria in 24 CFR 570.208(a)(3)? <br />Yes❑ No ❑ N/A Z if no, explain: <br />(viii) Does the grantee have property(s) still held in a land bank? (NSP properties can be land banked for <br />a maximum of 10 years after closeout.) <br />Yes❑ No [Z If yes, are the properties logged into DRGR? Yes❑ No ❑ <br />(ix) Does the grantee have a feasible plan to obligate each property in a land bank for redevelopment? <br />Yes❑ No ❑ N/A ® if no, explain: <br />(x) Will the end use of the property still in a land bank meet a National Objective? <br />Yes❑ No ❑ N/A GZ if no, explain: <br />(xi) Does the grantee still have unused funds held in a Loan Loss Reserve? <br />Yes❑ No GZ If yes, explain: <br />(xii) NSP2 only - Did the grantee meet all energy efficiency improvement and sustainable development <br />plans laid put in their application? (Factor 5 of the NSP2 NOFA included: green building standards, <br />transit accessibility, re -use of cleared sites, deconstruction, sustainable development practices) <br />Yes❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ if no, explain: <br />(xiii) NSP2 only— Did the grantee work in all of the census tracts provided as part of its target area in its <br />application or amended application? <br />Yes❑ No ❑ if no, explain: <br />(xiv) NSP2 only - Is there evidence that a NSP2 grantee has either returned a minimum of 100 <br />abandoned or foreclosed homes back to productive use or otherwise eliminated or mitigated their <br />negative effects on the stability of the target geography? <br />Yes ❑ Non N/A ❑ If no, did the grantee do its due diligence? <br />HUD Form 40179 <br />Page 2 <br />P32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.