05/02/2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The following istaken from Brevard County's wastewater site, pertaining totheir facility: Figure 5. The Septageand Grease Receiving Facility Is loc&W at 11*01 N. VVickham Rd In Melbourne. The station is open Down to D�sk seven clays-perweel0f afterhours service Is needed, special arrangements can be made bycalling the Wanewater.Treatment Plam.0filie at 321-255-432& The Fadlltyloocei:ts septsaa and a collected from It does not acoept Industrial or hazardous wasterrhe rate for disposal Is $69.96 per = oallonL All haulers must be duly Iken"ed be duly licarised by*eamCounty Consumer*eatm. All vehicles must meet state and federal regulations governing tronsism of waste liquid an public roadways. Prior to any disposal activity, the applicant will provide cqrdfWNWs) of insumnoe� verifying AuW Liability Insurance with combined limits for 890y Itifury and property Dwranoe in an amount no less than $30DAW per occurrence. Insurance must remain in affect and a o"mom Information please pm321455-4321L Brevard County's rates are 123% higher than Indian River County and include restrictions on the incoming wastes, prohibiting items; such as porta-potties and mixed loads of septage and grease. Location Rate�_�� Equivalent To Indian River County Dewatering Facility $ 7.51/wet ton $31.32/1000 gallons 8rovvardCounty Septageand Grease Facility $13.19/wetton $55.00/1000 gallons Brevard County Septegeand Grease Facility $16.78/vvetton $69.96/1000 gallons City ofWest Palm Beach Septageand Grease Facility $15.75/wetb»n $65.67/1000 gallons — Monday through Saturday City ofWest Palm Beach Septa8eand Grease Facility $23.62/\wettun $98.51/1000 gallons —SundayandHo|idoys ~Assmm«oa*#/cmm After reviewing the findings of the manifests, ameeting was held on Tuesday, April 25, 20D,with local septaQehaulers houpdate them onthe issues |RCDUS isfacing. Eight haulers intotal were invited: five attended, two were unable to attend and there was one no-show. As the regulatory agency for the hauling companies, representatives from the Department of Health were in attendance as well. As of the date ofthis agenda, approximate costs of $147,000 for laboratory expenses, staff time, Wetlands Cell 14maintenance and outside consultants have been encumbered tohelp bring the . RVV\NTFbackintopenmb compliance. There will be additional expenses that will be based on results from the unit operations and process control audit currently being conducted. Tipping fees from the biosolids collection fee have not covered the above costs, nor will they cover these unanticipated expenses. Existing rate payers could potentially be subsidizing out of county wastes. What can be confirmed, and what is the least costly solution at the moment, istoreduce oreliminate the nutrient loading tothe VVRVVVVTFfrom the RDF. Ideally, all loading above and beyond what |RCDUShas 10process from its regional VVVVTFs should beomitted. Practically speaking, that option may not be viable. The economic and environmental challenges posed by this option are great. A more realistic option is to prohibit all out -of -county waste from coming to the RDF. By reducing 669/6 of the nutrient loading from hauled waste brought to the site by septic haulers, staff believes that this is a very large first step in correcting the nutrient anomalies that have caused the WRWV%fTF to be out of permit compliance. Continued allowance of out -of -county waste delays a solution and further affects IRCDUS's ability tomeet its permit requirements, resulting ininevitable and continued FDEPscrutiny, potential fines attached to the Consent Order, and may result in additional capital costs incurred either at the RDF or WRWVVTF (or both) tomitigate the nutrient loading. Areview ofthe FDEPwebsite has on interactive map reflecting other treatment facilities that may beaccepting hauled waste (see Figure 6). Page 5vvo imE