Laserfiche WebLink
r SEP 15 <br />8DOX <br />TRANSPORTATION FUND <br />1992/93 <br />TRANSPORTATION FUND <br />1. No millage <br />2. Rolled -back - N/A <br />3. The county proposed Transportation Fund Budget is <br />8 47 34 Current year is 9,969 -j -ft a $222,415 decrease <br />or 2.60%. <br />4. The Transportation Fund includes Public Works Department, <br />Engineering Department, TraMc Engineering and Road and Bridge <br />HIGHLIGHTS• , <br />- $700,000 continued bridge replacement <br />One (1) position (Maintenance Worker VI) <br />recommended for data gathering required for MPO and <br />Inter -modal Surface Transportation EWk1ency Act of <br />1991 (ISTE). <br />Salary Contingency <br />- A salary reserve of $52,150 for raises to budgets. <br />87 PAom <br />County Administrator Jim Chandler explained that the <br />Transportation Fund includes Public Works, Engineering, Traffic <br />Engineering and Road & Bridge, as well as funding for continued <br />bridge replacement and funding for the Metropolitan Planning <br />Organization. The total proposed budget for FY 1992-93 is <br />$8,347,349 and contains a decrease of $222,415. The Transportation <br />Fund is funded by a variety of sources including the gas tax, the <br />constitutional gas tax, the MSTU and the General Fund. There is no <br />tax rate applicable on this particular budget item. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that if anyone wishes to have the <br />following Resolutions read aloud in their entirety, OMB Director <br />Joe Baird would be glad to do so. - He explained that the <br />Resolutions are structured so that they are identical to the one <br />already read and the only difference would be the numbers. <br />Generally, there are two Resolutions on each account, one for the <br />millage and one for the budget. With the leave of the Board, <br />Director Baird will read just the numbers and save .time tonight, <br />and the Board indicated their approval. Attorney Vitunac asked <br />15 <br />