Laserfiche WebLink
Category <br />Category <br />County <br />Applicant <br />Project <br />Requested <br />Running Total <br />Cost Share <br />Match as <br />%of Total <br />Total Project <br />Comments <br />AVG <br />SD <br />Ranking <br />Funding <br />Match <br />Cost <br />Project <br />Engagement <br />1 <br />IR <br />ORCA <br />The Living lagoon <br />$ 37,434.00 <br />$ 37,434.00 <br />$ 166,203.00 <br />82% <br />$ 203,637.00 <br />87.60 <br />6.0 <br />Building Capacity for <br />Engagement <br />2 <br />LW <br />Marine Resources <br />Council <br />Citizen Engagement <br />with the Indian River <br />$ 28,788.00 <br />$ 66,222.O0 <br />$ 50,388.00 <br />64% <br />$ 79,176.00 <br />Implementation MUST demonstrate lagoon wide coverage <br />86.40 <br />7.2 <br />LagoonWatch Network <br />1. Great Idea to try and quantify the value to Converting yard to Florida <br />Source and <br />fdendly Landscaping. 10 yards doesn't seem to be a targe enough sample to <br />. <br />Concentration <br />be significant. Also concerned that the results should dearly measure the <br />Surface at r <br />Surface Water <br />difference between weVdry season n noff AND vlaue of FFY/Lawn. Also <br />Engagement <br />3 <br />B <br />University of Florida <br />Nutrients from <br />E 27,401.00 <br />$ 93,623.00 <br />$ 11.668.00 <br />30% <br />$ 39,069.00 <br />concerned that septic or legacy septic could skew results in such a small <br />8000 <br />6.9 <br />Residential Waterfront <br />sample. 2. should have been submitted under the Science and Innovative <br />Homes in Brevard <br />Technologies category and not the Citizen Engagement and Education <br />County, Florida <br />category. I believe It's a strong proposal but the ultimate goal for the project <br />is to answer a research question and the proposal does not directly engage <br />many ci8zens. <br />Audubon Advocates <br />Pelican Island <br />and Lagoon Gardens: <br />Engagement <br />4 <br />IR <br />Audubon Society Inc. <br />Changing behavior to <br />S 25.000.00 <br />$ 118,623.00 <br />$ 98,354.00 <br />80% <br />$ 123.354.00 <br />79.00 <br />5.1 <br />(PIAS) <br />Improve Lagoon <br />habitat <br />Shelfth Harvests in <br />the Indian River <br />Engagement <br />5 <br />V. 8 <br />University of Central <br />Lagoon: Restoring <br />$ 9.891.00 <br />$ 128.514.00 <br />E 11,409.00 <br />54% <br />$ 21.300.00 <br />1. This is an extremely unique proposal, but I'm not certain that IRLNEP Is <br />75.50 <br />13.5 <br />Florida <br />Biodiversity through <br />the right fit. 2. interesting project, but is it important for lagoon restoration? <br />Capturing Historical <br />Reflections <br />Martne Discovery <br />Center, Marine <br />This project with Lagoon Watch seems like a lot of money for water <br />Resources Council, <br />monitoring that does not include any nutrient data. As a lagoon volunteer for <br />Volusia County <br />Project H2O Phase III: <br />many years and a water monitor for a couple of years. I have never seen any <br />Engagement <br />6 <br />V <br />Environmental <br />Citizen Science <br />$ 31,950.00 <br />S 160,484.00 <br />$ 41,350.00 <br />56% <br />$ 73,300.00 <br />results or comments about trend from the existing water monitoring program <br />74.40 <br />12.6 <br />Management, Florida <br />Engagement <br />that has been going on for 25 years. If the quality control and better reporting <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />can significantly Improve the usefulness of the data, there consider funding <br />Conservation <br />that portion only for this year. <br />Commission <br />COLVI <br />