My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/20/2017
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
06/20/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 1:57:32 PM
Creation date
8/21/2017 11:46:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/20/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to <br />0) <br />Total Project <br />Cost <br />Comments <br />AVG <br />SD <br />168.222.00 <br />Strong partners, unique school location on IRL. May need some permit and <br />'76.8 <br />6.8 <br />technical assltantoe. Really strong education component. <br />1. More of a research project. 2. Fund. Valuable pilot project. Novel <br />163,061.00 <br />approach to septic repurposing. Economic analysis could help Incentivize <br />74.0 <br />12.4 <br />septic to sewer conversions. ID of sites and selection criteria vague. Permits <br />and variances may be required. Strong partners. <br />1,341,505.25 <br />Fund. Ready to move, 76 acres, good water quality benefits. <br />72.0 <br />9.8 <br />Fund. Very Interesting, high value restoration with many unique feature. High <br />24,400.00 <br />visibility. Restoration value, water quality improvement. Historic and cultural <br />70.0 <br />18.6 <br />value. Wetland creation, invasive. exotic removal. <br />Weak proposal but concept is sound. Great to see commercial shellfish <br />61,864.48 <br />Industry participation. Proposal lacks detail but IRLNEP should work with <br />63.8 <br />16.5 <br />proposer to advance the idea. Not clear how project will define success. <br />High value restoration project. High visibility with multiple benefits. Low score <br />150,000.00 <br />reflects lack of detail In proposal not restoration value. Evidence that area <br />61.5 <br />12.8 <br />has strong oyster recruitment. No educational component hurts proposal. <br />Interesting appracch to use oyster restoration on shoreline of outfalis. Would <br />40,000.00 <br />provide polishing of water. Some conoems about salinity range and <br />60 7 <br />12 3 <br />survivability. This project might need more work, or, if funded, utilize IRLNEP <br />partners to help. <br />1. This is really a research project. 2. This project should be deferred until <br />100,000.00 <br />after Dr. Trefry completes study with Satellite Beach (if funded). Weak <br />57.8 <br />12.0 <br />support on science side, monitoring and how to quantify success. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.