06/20/2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CD Category Ranking Ranking Applicant Project Requested Funding Running Total Cost Share Match Match as �6pro� l Total Project Comments AVG SD Coat Verification and validation of high- 1. [Stated under both technical merit and benefits to IRL) Relative to other resolution numerical knowledge gaps, how critical is a wave model? 2. Wind, wave and Science & 16 LW Florida Institute of wave model $ 54,079.00 $ 1.181,999.23 $ 18,897.00 24% $ 70.776.00 decisions. circulation model for entire IRL will be important74.8 Technology Technology predictions in the IRL Need to discuss with SJRWMD to see if their odelers anndwn 4.2 for planning of coastal communicating?? Check match. 3. it would be better to link this modeling restoration / costal with ongoing efforts more explicitly. development 1. Concerned about the cost-effectiveness. I liked this project much better then the score reflects. If they were requesting funds for validation of an Harbor Branch The use of community- already -proven technology. I would have scored H higher. 2. Biological Science & 17 SL Oceanographic based Indicators In indicators for sediment contaminants; novel survey technique; might take Technology Institute, Florida determining $ 180,075.00 $ 1,362,07423 $ 60,000.00 25% $ 240.075.00 some time to validate methodology for application and management 73.8 11.5 Atlantic University environmental health guidance. Cost? 3. Bacterial community composition may be a very sensitive Indicator ofpollution," but it Is unlikely to be an Indicator of a spedfic type of pollution and the relevance of any differences is not clearly demonstrated. Modeling ecosystem Harbor Branch dynamics in the Indian 1. This Is a continuationproject anti regardless of score Unless the first Science 6 16 SL Oceanographic River Lagoon and $ year product was a total disaster) I believe H should be supported. 2. 2nd Technology Institute, Florida assessing the 48,317.00 $ 1,410,391.23 $ 21,958.00 31% $ 70.273.00 phase ongoing work; model has broad applications; must integrate with other 73.7 5.0 Atlantic University potential impacts of models like SJRWMDs; should be refunded despite low score. 3. It would ' climate change be better to Ink this modeling with ongoing efforts more explicitly. 1. Important in that proposal looks at pharna and personal care products; Monitoring Pollutants human health issues should be elevated as funding priorities; concern about ' Science S 19 SL ORCA of Concern for Human $ 64,010.00 $ 1,474,401.23 $ 50.000.00 44% $ 114,010.00 M experimental design ails; strong team; questions about how this "act 73.2 Technology Health In the Indian would inform management decisions. 2. The lade of understanding 7.0 River Lagoon regarding the limitations of Microlox tests raise concerns. Past experience With similar date indicated a problem with interpretation of results. Copepod grazinggrazing on Science 6 Florida Institute of' harm armfulla algal blooms 1. Minimum matc h. 2. Important consideration fora I bloom science. Technology 20 B Technology and the effect of $ 55,284.00 $ 1,529,68523 S 18,615.00 25% $ 73,ggg,00 Bask scientific research. not clear how it would advise resource 72,0 7.0 salinity on grazing management and restoration. 3. This work will expand on existing rates information. Perhaps, not a tremendously thigh priority. Biogeochemical model 1. Not sure what to make of this project match. Regardless of score, I do Science 8 Sunergy Power of St. Lurie West's not support this project in the research category. I would feel more Technology 21 SL Systems, Inc attainment of on -she $ 50,000.00 $ 1,579,685.23 $ 353.107,00 88% $ 403,107.00 comfortable if it were in with other stromwater projects. 2. Not clear how 62.8 12A TMDL for Total this provides broad/new guidance for other locations or how robust the model Phosphorus. might be. 3. The proposed work was not presented In a way that allowed for rigorous evaluation of its utility. Sclence Total: $ 1,579,685.23 $ 1,164,070.57 $ 2,743,755.60 CD