My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/08/2014 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
07/08/2014 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:09:29 PM
Creation date
8/29/2017 4:18:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
07/08/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. <br />2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd. <br />Boca Raton, FL 33431 <br />Tel: +1 561 391 8102 <br />Fax: +1 561 391 9116 <br />www.CBI.com <br />Mobilization/Demobilization <br />GBC's mobilization/demobilization cost is $300,000. This is higher than CB&I's estimate of $110,000 <br />and the average bid of approximately $181,000. However, the line item cost is not high enough to <br />deem it to be over weighted as it is only 10% of the total project cost. This is not an unusual <br />percentage for mobilization/demobilization effort_ JPDC's mobilization/demobilization cost of $18,000 is <br />much lower. JPDC is based in Fort Pierce and thus a low mobilization/demobilization can be <br />substantiated. <br />Dune Fill <br />Both GBC and JPDC propose to construct the project with 100% of the fill volume supplied by the Davis <br />Mine. As of January 2014, the Davis Mine indicated that 15,000 cubic yards of processed sand had <br />been stockpiled and an additional 70,000 cubic yards of in-situ material had been excavated for <br />screening. While the current stockpile is insufficient to meet the project's fill volume requirements, it is <br />anticipated that the lead time to be provided by the County between contract award and <br />commencement of construction will be adequate to stockpile sufficient volumes of processed sand for <br />the project. Exclusive use of this mine and current stockpile volume is not an immediate concern. <br />GBC's cost to supply dune fill is $8.50/cy, which is similar to JPDC's cost of $9.00/cy. While these <br />costs are lower than the average cost of the nine bids to supply dune fill ($11.23/cy), and lower than <br />Co&I's estimate ($16.83/cy), the costs are in line with the price to purchase sand during the previous <br />Sector 3 project. Thus, this price appears to be reasonable and achievable. <br />GBC's cost to deliver dune fill was $4.00 per cubic yard plus an additional $4.00 per cubic yard to place <br />it on the beach for a total of $8.00 per cubic yard. The CB&I's estimate was $7.43 per cubic yard to <br />deliver and place dune fill. JPDC's cost to deliver and place dune fill was $11.00 per cubic yard, which <br />was in line with the average bid of $12.13 per cubic yard. The cost to deliver and place dune fill is <br />reasonable and in line with expectations. <br />Turbidity Monitoring <br />The project template is located above mean high water. Therefore, it is a reasonable assumption that <br />turbidity monitoring will not be required if using an upland sand source. GBC's lump sum cost for <br />turbidity monitoring of $10.00 appears to be based on the assumption that no turbidity monitoring will <br />be required. While turbidity monitoring may not be necessary, clarification from FDEP should be <br />sought. In the event that FDEP does require monitoring, the County will have limited monetary <br />leverage to enforce permit compliance. <br />JPDC's lump sum cost is $10,000, which is lower than the CB&I's estimate of $29,350 and the average <br />bid of approximately $32,440. <br />Assuming that turbidity monitoring is required at a cost close to CB&I's estimate, and GBC or JPDC <br />successfully obtains a change order to perform this work, it would not affect the order of bid costs. <br />Given that turbidity monitoring will likely not be required and that the low bid submitted for this line does <br />not substantially impact the overall bid price, it is recommended that the County accept both bids as <br />being responsive with respect to this line item. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.