My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/11/2017
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
07/11/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 3:40:00 PM
Creation date
9/14/2017 10:28:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
07/11/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
543
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDER NO. PSC-17-0230-TRF-EI <br /> DOCKET NO. 170096-EI <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> regular meter reading date may be advanced or postponed not more than 5 days without a <br /> proration of the billing for the period, but did not address the application of tiered rates to <br /> extended billing periods. Tiered rates, such as FPL's residential energy charges, apply a higher <br /> energy charge to usage above 1,000 kilowatt-hours. <br /> FPL has proposed to add language to Tariff Sheet No. 6.050 to reflect the statutory <br /> requirements and to include the Company's current billing practices in its tariff. The revised <br /> tariff sheet addresses both the proration of charges when billing periods are varied by more than <br /> five days, as well as the prohibition against charging higher tiered rates if the extension of a <br /> billing period of more than five days causes a customer's energy consumption to exceed the <br /> Company's tier threshold of 1,000 kilowatt-hours. FPL has represented that its current business <br /> practices regarding bill proration and administration of tiered rates are in compliance with <br /> Section 366.05(1)(b), F.S. <br /> Section 366.05(1)(c), F.S., provides that for an existing account, the total deposit may not <br /> exceed two months of average actual charges. For a new service request, the total deposit may <br /> not exceed two months of projected charges. Once a new customer has had continuous service <br /> for a 12-month period, the amount of the deposit shall be recalculated using actual data. Any <br /> difference between the projected and actual amounts must be resolved by the customer paying <br /> the additional amount that may be billed by the utility or the utility returning any overcharge. <br /> We amended Rule 25-6.097(1), F.A.C., to state that a utility's methodology for <br /> determining customer deposits for existing and new accounts shall conform to Section <br /> 366.05(1)(c), F.S.3 The prior rule language already required that the total amount of a deposit <br /> not exceed twice the average monthly bill. <br /> FPL's proposed amendments to Tariff Sheet Nos. 6.040 and 6.050 conform to the new <br /> statutory language regarding the recalculation of the deposit after 12-months. FPL's proposed <br /> amendments to Tariff Sheet Nos. 6.040 and 6.050 comport with this language by providing that: <br /> (a) if the recalculated deposit amount based on the previous 12-months billing history is less than <br /> the customer's current deposit amount, the difference between the deposit amounts will be <br /> applied as a credit to the customer account; and (b) if the recalculated deposit amount exceeds <br /> the customer's current deposit amount, the Company may request an additional deposit amount. <br /> FPL also proposed some administrative revisions to Tariff Sheet Nos. 4.020, 9.400, and 9.410 to <br /> conform to Rule 25-6.097, F.A.C. <br /> Pursuant to Rule 25-6.097(3), F.A.C., utility customers receive refunds of their deposits <br /> with interest after a period of 23 months of continuous service, assuming their payment record is <br /> satisfactory. Therefore, for the majority of utility customers, the deposit amount recalculation <br /> after a 12-month period of continuous service occurs only once. <br /> Having reviewed the applicable statutes, rules, and proposed tariffs filed by FPL, we find <br /> that the tariff sheet revisions conform to the applicable statutes and rules. Therefore, we approve <br /> FPL's requested modifications to Tariff Sheet Nos. 4.020, 6.040, 6.050, 9.400, and 9.410, as <br /> reflected in Attachment A, effective June 5, 2017. <br /> Based on the above, it is <br /> 3 Id. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.