My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-117
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2017
>
2017-117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2017 11:24:23 AM
Creation date
12/6/2017 11:24:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2017-117
Approved Date
12/05/2017
Agenda Item Number
8.E.
Resolution Type
Report
Entity Name
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee
Subject
2017 Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
facilities, and public buildings, and capacity charges fund expansion of the county's <br /> regional water and sewer system. Because those fees are based on fair share payments by <br /> the people benefiting from the capital improvements, impact fees and utility capacity <br /> charges cannot be waived or reduced for any individual group or category of <br /> construction. On the other hand, those fees increase the cost of housing and put a burden <br /> on the production of affordable housing projects. To lessen the impact of those fees on <br /> affordable housing projects, the cost of impact fees may be paid by other funding sources. <br /> Waiving impact fees does not eliminate the cost of the infrastructure that the impact fees <br /> are designed to pay for. Either new development or existing residents must pay the cost <br /> of needed infrastructure improvements. If new development, which puts additional <br /> demand on county facilities, does not pay its fair share of infrastructure cost through <br /> impact fees, then existing residents will have to pay those costs through higher fees or <br /> taxes. <br /> While waiving or reducing impact fees without a justifiable subsidy is not legal, impact <br /> fees for affordable units may be paid from other funding sources. Consistent with that <br /> allowance, the county provides impact fee loans and grants to extremely low, very low, <br /> and moderate income households thorough the SHIP program. <br /> In the past, the county has provided impact fee grants and loans to eligible households as <br /> part of several CDBG neighborhood revitalization and housing projects. Also, the county <br /> provides impact fee loans associated with new home construction to all Habitat for <br /> Humanity clients. In addition, the county provides impact fee grants and loans to eligible <br /> individuals needing to connect to the county water or sewer system. <br /> Overall, the county has provided many SHIP impact fee grants/loans to eligible <br /> households. Since this program has been successful, the county should keep its SHIP <br /> Program impact fee assistance strategy for income qualified households. <br /> Since 2009 the county has suspended payment of several impact fees, thus reducing <br /> impact fee costs for new developments and new housing units. 2013/2014 impact fee <br /> study has also revised and reduced many impact fees. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The county should maintain Housing Element Policy 4.3 and Policy 4.4, regarding <br /> financing of impact fees, payment of impact fees, and payment of water and wastewater <br /> capacity charges for income eligible households through SHIP funds. <br /> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: <br /> Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation <br /> Yes [i] No ❑ <br /> F:\Community Development\SHIP\AHAC-Affordable Housing Advisory Committee(AHAC)\AHAC 2017\AHAC 2017 8 <br /> report.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.