My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-117
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2017
>
2017-117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2017 11:24:23 AM
Creation date
12/6/2017 11:24:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2017-117
Approved Date
12/05/2017
Agenda Item Number
8.E.
Resolution Type
Report
Entity Name
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee
Subject
2017 Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G. The allowance of flexible lot configuration, <br /> including zero lot line configurations for <br /> affordable housing. <br /> Currently, the Board of County Commissioners may grant waivers from the residential <br /> development standards found in Chapter 911 of the LDRs through the Planned <br /> Development (PD) process established in Chapter 915 of the county LDRs. If granted, <br /> these waivers can allow for development of small lot configuration, zero lot line and <br /> reduced setback projects. The waiver criteria for the PD process are found in section <br /> 915.15 of the LDRs and are provided below. <br /> Section 915.15. <br /> Planned development allowable waivers and development parameters. <br /> (1) Conceptual P.D.plans shall list,for all areas and phases within the P.D.project area, the proposed <br /> waivers and development parameters for the following: <br /> a. Minimum lot size(in square feet); <br /> b. Minimum lot width(in feet); <br /> c. Minimum lot frontage(in feet); <br /> d. Minimum yard setbacks for buildings:front,rear,and side; <br /> e. Minimum yard setbacks for accessory structures (such as pools, patios, and decks);front, rear, and <br /> side; <br /> f. Maximum lot coverage;building(s)and impervious surface area; <br /> g. Minimum separation distances between buildings; <br /> h. Minimum right-of-way widths(by road type); <br /> i. Minimum open space per lot and by phase[Note: The minimum open space for the entire project <br /> shall meet or exceed the requirements of section 915.18./ <br /> j. Minimum preservation/conservation area per lot. <br /> Note:more conceptual plan submittal requirements are listed-out in section 915.22 <br /> (2) Notwithstanding other provisions in this chapter(915) and Chapter 971, specific land use criteria <br /> listed in Chapter 971 may be waived(modified or not applied) where such criteria would merely apply to <br /> the compatibility of uses within the P.D.project area if approved by the county. Where specific land use <br /> criteria apply to the relationship of a use(s) within a P.D.project and properties adjacent to the project <br /> area,the specific land use criteria shall apply pursuant to the provisions of chapter 971. <br /> (3) The conventional standards and criteria found in Chapter 911, Zoning, not covered in section <br /> 915.15(1)shall apply unless otherwise specifically waived or modified by other provisions of this chapter. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> Generally, the PD process serves as a mechanism whereby the county can approve <br /> projects with reduced setbacks and/or mixed uses. The advantage of using the PD process <br /> instead of traditional zoning is that an applicant can increase or at least maximize his <br /> development project's density. In the PD process, however, there are development <br /> required trade-offs, such as additional landscaping, which are required to gain the waivers <br /> for smaller lots and higher yield. These trade-offs can have the effect of off-setting any <br /> housing unit price reductions due to increasing yield. The county's small lot subdivision <br /> allowance, however, provides for specific reduced lot sizes, and setbacks without <br /> requiring any specific waivers. <br /> F:ACommunity Development\SHIP\AHAC-Affordable Housing Advisory Committee(AHAC)\AHAC 2017\AHAC 2017 17 <br /> report.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.