Laserfiche WebLink
When asked by one of the FPL representatives what provisions in the Project Contracts would <br />have to be changed to make such a transaction workable for OUC, Mr. Browder replied that the <br />requirements prohibiting sales to non -tax-exempt entities would likely implicate OUC's <br />opportunity sales and would likely require a tax opinion. He also indicated that the <br />assignments would involve issues with past and future cost allocations as between Vero Beach <br />and OUC, and that it's likely that other FMPA members would want the same concessions or <br />amendments. In summary, nothing has changed from OUC's perspective since the parties, <br />including FMPA, discussed these issues in May 2014. <br />Pat Bryan asked whether Vero's representatives had asked FMPA whether they had any ideas. <br />Schef Wright replied that he has asked or discussed this issue with FMPA representatives over <br />time, and that FMPA's response continues to be that they that they will respond if and when <br />Vero Beach, OUC, and FPL have something definitive to propose or suggest to FMPA that is <br />compliant with Vero's contracts with FMPA. <br />There was no further substantive discussion, and the call was concluded at approximately <br />10:15AM. <br />2 <br />236 <br />