01/16/2018 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

was submitted with the Traffic Study, the reviewer has both in front of them. He stated by doing both at the same time, Public Works was following the TRC deadline, so the developer would get comments when the TRC comments went back out, eliminating wait time. Chairperson Robinson noted if the developer wanted to turn the Traffic Study in for the first TRC meeting, it would be reviewed. Mr. Szpyrka added, it would be reviewed as long as it came in with the plan. Mr. Boling clarified the motion, the recommendation for the Code change would be required by the second submittal; however, it would be allowed at the first submittal. THE CHAIRPERSON CALLED FOR THE QUESTION and the vote was unanimous (12-0) in favor of the motion. ON MOTION BY Mr. Melchiori, SECONDED BY Mr. Paladin, the Committee voted unanimously (12-0) to move the Traffic methodology pre -application conference before the TRC meeting. ON MOTION BY Mr. Paladin, SECONDED BY Mr. Mechling, to add one week to the process timetable to allow staff to meet together to discuss and coordinate all comments prior to the TRC Meeting. UNDER DISCUSSION, it was confirmed the number of days indicated in the timeline on Attachment 1, under pre -application conference, wherein the Code mandated 4 days, and actual staff time was 14 days; adding 7 days (staffs recommendation, with added county staff) would be enough time. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION and the vote was unanimous (12-0) in favor of the motion. Mr. Stephen Melchiori, Alternate Representative asked Mr. Boling what triggered change to the Code and how did a developer prevent relying on outdated or changed Code information. Mr. Melchiori suggested having direction or process for any changes to the standards in the Code, whether it was published online or on the County website, as it would assist developers in ensuring up-to-date changes were known before submitting site plans. Mr. Boling replied it depended upon whether or not he is referring to a land development regulation change or a change to a technical specification standard such as a Utility Construction Standard. He reminded the Committee communication was a very important tool to utilize. Chairperson Robinson agreed any new requirements as far as process should be on the County website, as a matter of uploading the information. C:\Users\sjohnson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\SEU7ML71\11.8.17 DRPP Minutes.doc 64