Laserfiche WebLink
G. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 15 <br />Block 10, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated October 29, 1992: <br />TO: - James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />FROM: David B. Cox, P.EOr— <br />Civil Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 15, Block 10, Vero Lake <br />Estates, Unit 1 <br />REFERENCE: Project No. 92100132 <br />DATE: October 29, 1992- CONSENT A A <br />John Lloyd Builders, Inc. has submitted a building permit application for a single family residence <br />on the subject property. The site is located in an AE flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 22.0 <br />ft. at the northwest corner of 85th Street and 92nd Avenue. In the attached letter dated April 14, <br />1992, the owner has requested the cut and fill balance waiver provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)4. of <br />the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance be granted by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. The request has been kept on file by staff until a building permit application was <br />submitted. The lot area is 1.06 acres. <br />The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section <br />930.07(2)(d)4. of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots over 1.0 <br />acres located in the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit. <br />The amount of 100 year floodplain displacement created by the proposed grading plan is estimated <br />as 420 cubic yards by the applicant's engineer. The attached letter signed and sealed on April 14, <br />1992 certifies that all applicable requirements of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection <br />Ordinance will be met. <br />Alternative No. 1 - Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section <br />930.07(2)(d)4. <br />Alternative No. 2 - Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to <br />compensate for the proposed floodplain displacement. <br />RECOMVIENDATION <br />Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. <br />Nov 10 IW& BOOK 87 F',i S7 <br />