Laserfiche WebLink
r - <br />Nov $ 7 1992 <br />Foa 88 FAa 32 <br />The number of /Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most <br />intense use of the subject property under the present zoning is <br />264. This was determined by multiplying the 45 DU's (most intense <br />use), by ITE's factor of 5.86 Average Daily Trip Ends/DU. <br />The number of peak hour/teak season/inbound trip ends associated <br />with the most intense use of the subject property under the present <br />zoning is 16. This as determined by taking 658 (local <br />measurement) of 45 DU's (most intense use), multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 0.55 peak hour trip end@/DU. <br />Similarly, the number of peak hour/peak season/outbound trips <br />associated with the most intense use of the subject property under <br />the present zoning is 9. This was determined by taking 358 (local <br />measurement) of 45 DU's (most intense use), multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 0.55 peak hour trip ends/DU. <br />The number of new p.m. peak hour outbound trips associated with <br />this request was determined by multiplying ITE's factor of 62.59 <br />Average Weekly Vehicle Trip Ends/1000 gross square feet by 145,300 <br />square feet (the most intense use) to get the total daily trips. <br />Dividing the total daily trips by 2 to get the 24 hour outbound <br />volume, applying the ITE Shopping Center Use p.m. peak hour <br />outbound factor (11%),, and multiplying that number by 708 ( based on <br />the ITE Manual) to ensure that only new trip ends are counted, <br />indicates that the total p.m. peak hour outbound trips for the <br />proposed use will be 350. <br />A similar methodology was used to project p.m. inbound trips. <br />Instead of the 118 factor used for outbound trips, a 10.38 factor <br />was used to estimate p.m. peak hour inbound trips. Using the same <br />methodology referenced above, the inbound trips were then assigned <br />to segments on the network. The result of this analysis was two <br />sets of project peak hour volumes for each impacted roadway segment <br />on the network. Since one set of volumes represents inbound trip <br />ends and the other represents outbound trip ends, the peak hour <br />volume for each direction for each segment was determined. The <br />capacity analysis for each segment was then done by taking the <br />project trip ends for the segment's peak direction and assessing <br />whether or not this volume was less than the segment's available <br />capacity. <br />Under the proposed land use designation, the greatest peak <br />hour/peak season impact will be the 350 trips generated in the <br />outbound direction. This total is 341 more than the 9 outbound <br />trips generated by the most intense use of the site under the <br />current land use designation. Therefore, the most intense use of <br />the subject property under the proposed land use designation would <br />generate 341 more new peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips <br />than would be generated by the most intense use of the site under <br />the present land use designation. Using a modified gravity model <br />and a hand assignment, these trips were then assigned to roadways <br />on the network. <br />Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are <br />calculated and updated annually, utilizing the latest and best <br />available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix <br />G methodology as set forth in the Florida Department of <br />Transportation Level of Service Manual. Available capacity is the <br />total capacity less existing and committed traffic volumes; .this is <br />updated daily based upon vesting associated with project approvals. <br />.7 <br />28 <br />� r <br />