Laserfiche WebLink
r NOV 2 4 1992 <br />TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator <br />THRU: Jack Price, Personnel Director � <br />FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager <br />DATE: 18 November 1992 <br />BOOK 88 PACE 151-7 <br />BUDGET AMENDMENT 004 - <br />SUBJECT: Change in Sheriffs Workers' Compensation Coverage <br />On October 27,1892, we were notified by LL Spencer of the Sherfff's Office that effective November 1 their <br />workers' c:omper>sation coverage through the County's self -Insurance pod would terminate and they <br />would purchase commercial overage through Hurt Insurance Group (HIG), Tallahassee, the huximbent <br />broker for the Sheriff's polio professional liability and automobile insurances. Although we have since <br />obtained from HIG a copy of their binder, we do not know arty details about their coverage limits, <br />provisions or type of policy. <br />Through the self4risurance program begun by the Board four years ago, the County formed its own <br />Internal Pte. Rather than pay first -dollar premiums to commercial insurers, the County opted to set aside <br />funding internally, based upon an annual actuarial study, with any surplus funds used to maintain the fund <br />and to reduce future year contributions. With the 1982-93 budget, the County realized a substantial <br />reduction in Its funding requirements, allowing for the allocation of available funds to other County <br />programs Through the self-insurance fund, constitutional officers and Board departments have combined <br />their risks, sharing them proportionately based upon their loss exposure. As such, some have benefitted <br />In greater proportion than others during any given year, but all have benefitted in the long-term by <br />allowing the County to fund its risks prudently and not to pay first -dollar insurance premiums which must <br />Include carrier. profits, State required guaranty fund contributions, expense constants, etc. <br />While the Sheriffs withdrawal from the pod has no immediate detrimental effect upon the Board's <br />Program, we are unsure about the long-term effects on the overall County budget The Sheriffs Office, <br />with approximately one fourth of the workers' compensation payroll, Incurs nearly one-fourth of the <br />County's Injuries with an accompanying onedhird of all workers' compensation costs. Only three years <br />ago, that same employee population accounted for over one -hall of the program's costs. If the new <br />Program Is monitored closely, with effective kms prevention and loss control techniques, it may work well. <br />If, however, it Is primarily administered by the third party claims administrator which is paying claims for <br />the prance company, its experience may revert to the position it was in three years ago and the <br />Premium costs will reflect that experience. Additionally. If the Sheriff desires to re-enter the pod based <br />upon adverse experience, the County's excess insurance premiums and State self -insurer assessment <br />fees would increase based upon the poor experience of that particular unit <br />At this time, staff recommends that the Board consider adoption of a policy which prohibits pool members <br />who have dropped out of the pool based upon perceived sholt46nn savings from having the right to <br />rejoin the pool WOW Board approval. Staff also recommends the Board approve the attached budget <br />amendment which moves workers' compensation funding into the Sheriffs budget. <br />Administrator Chandler requested the budget amendment be <br />postponed until a later date because there is a question about <br />distribution or the movement of funds into various divisions within <br />the Sheriff's Department. <br />50 <br />