My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/17/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
12/17/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:34 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:15:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/17/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to meet new standards which are much higher, resulting in a major <br />cost differential. When the old systems are abandoned and the <br />mobile home parks are connected to the County's system, the true <br />costs of buying, maintaining, operating and repairing the system <br />become apparent. <br />Commissioner Adams asked whether we have an automatic increase <br />in rates when there is a mandate from St. Johns River Water <br />Management District to conserve water. <br />Director Pinto noted that we do not have an automatic <br />increase. In the original plan, there was a requirement to <br />identify what we would do in case of an emergency. Our emergency <br />water conservation plan will commence only when a water shortage is <br />declared and only after a public hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird described a typical situation where a <br />development has its own utility system, the residents enjoy low <br />rates and everything is working, but there is an agreement to <br />connect to the County system. He asked Director Pinto to explain <br />why the County cannot bypass that development. <br />Director Pinto explained that we cannot replace certain <br />systems and allow others to continue because it is not financially <br />feasible, it would cripple the regional system, and because it <br />involves the health and welfare of the entire community. Once we <br />begin a project it cannot be handled on a selective basis. He <br />pointed out that a private wastewater treatment plant is never <br />built in the middle of the area it will service but rather on the <br />edge of the development, so if that system fails, it affects the <br />neighbors and ends up contaminating someone else's well. That <br />makes wastewater a community problem. When that inevitable failure <br />occurs and you have not provided capacity at the treatment plant <br />for the failed system, it becomes a major catastrophe for the <br />community. <br />Director Pinto related that the County is also responsible for <br />the proper disposal of solid waste, meaning garbage or trash. <br />Indian River County does that through a landfill. Solid waste <br />disposal has become a very technical field, a strictly regulated <br />and expensive operation. In the past solid waste was handled on <br />what was called a tipping fee, wherein the hauler paid a fee based <br />on weight. When additional landfill area was needed, the tipping <br />fee was not enough to pay for it. Now the County .applies an annual <br />assessment on each improved parcel of property in the county, <br />providing steady revenue to operate the landfill and to repay the <br />borrowed money. Recently the State required a 30 percent reduction <br />in solid waste which called for a rather sophisticated, elaborate <br />and expensive recycling system. That cost is also included in that <br />3 <br />DEC 17 1992 BOOK 88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.